Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuheng Ma 0001
dblp:258/0645-1
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 4 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
4 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 87% Security and privacy of machine learning · 13% | |
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Learning theory · 37% Generative modeling · 34% Time series and sequential data · 15% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
2.2 | 3 | 2024 | Optimal Locally Private Nonparametric Classification with Public Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Better Locally Private Sparse Estimation Given Multiple Samples Per User · ICML 2024 Decision Tree for Locally Private Estimation with Public Data · NeurIPS 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
local differential privacy |
2.2 | 3 | 2024 | Optimal Locally Private Nonparametric Classification with Public Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 Better Locally Private Sparse Estimation Given Multiple Samples Per User · ICML 2024 Decision Tree for Locally Private Estimation with Public Data · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | PrAda-GAN: A Private Adaptive Generative Adversarial Network with Bayes Network Structure · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
privacy-preserving GAN |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | PrAda-GAN: A Private Adaptive Generative Adversarial Network with Bayes Network Structure · AAAI 2026 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › generative model security
privacy of generative models |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | PrAda-GAN: A Private Adaptive Generative Adversarial Network with Bayes Network Structure · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
anomaly detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bagged Regularized k-Distances for Anomaly Detection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bagged Regularized k-Distances for Anomaly Detection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › minimax estimation
minimax rates |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Locally Private Nonparametric Classification with Public Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
nonparametric classification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Locally Private Nonparametric Classification with Public Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Better Locally Private Sparse Estimation Given Multiple Samples Per User · ICML 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
sparse estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Better Locally Private Sparse Estimation Given Multiple Samples Per User · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Extrapolated Random Tree for Regression · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
nonparametric regression |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Extrapolated Random Tree for Regression · ICML 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
private statistical estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Decision Tree for Locally Private Estimation with Public Data · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
privacy-preserving machine learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Locally Private Nonparametric Classification with Public Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
differential privacy · 2.0bayesian network structure learning · 2.0convex optimization · 1.7bagging · 1.7AUC regret analysis · 1.7data-driven pruning · 1.5classification tree · 1.5variable selection · 0.8low-dimensional estimation · 0.8minimax optimal estimation · 0.7extrapolation · 0.7decision tree · 0.7convergence rate analysis · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | PrAda-GAN: A Private Adaptive Generative Adversarial Network with Bayes Network Structure
Ke Jia, Yuheng Ma 0001 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2025 | Locally Private Estimation with Public FeaturesabstractWe initiate the study of locally differentially private (LDP) learning with public features. We define semi-feature LDP, where some features are publicly available while the remaining ones, along with the label, require protection under local differential privacy. Under semi-feature LDP, we demonstrate that the mini-max convergence rate for non-parametric regression is significantly reduced compared to that of classical LDP. Then we propose HistOfTree, an estimator that fully leverages the information contained in both public and private features. Theoretically, HistOfTree reaches the mini-max optimal convergence rate. Empirically, HistOfTree achieves superior performance on both synthetic and real data. We also explore scenarios where users have the flexibility to select features for protection manually. In such cases, we propose an estimator and a data-driven parameter tuning strategy, leading to analogous theoretical and empirical results. Yuheng Ma 0001, Ke Jia, Hanfang Yang |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2025 | ALTER: Augmentation for Large-Table-Based ReasoningabstractHan Zhang, Yuheng Ma, Hanfang Yang. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Yuheng Ma 0001, Hanfang Yang |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 2 |
| 2025 | Bagged Regularized k-Distances for Anomaly DetectionabstractWe consider the paradigm of unsupervised anomaly detection, which involves the identification of anomalies within a dataset in the absence of labeled examples. Though distance-based methods are top-performing for unsupervised anomaly detection, they suffer heavily from the sensitivity to the choice of the number of the nearest neighbors. In this paper, we propose a new distance-based algorithm called bagged regularized $k$-distances for anomaly detection (BRDAD), converting the unsupervised anomaly detection problem into a convex optimization problem. Our BRDAD algorithm selects the weights by minimizing the surrogate risk, i.e., the finite sample bound of the empirical risk of the bagged weighted $k$-distances for density estimation (BWDDE). This approach enables us to successfully address the sensitivity challenge of the hyperparameter choice in distance-based algorithms. Moreover, when dealing with large-scale datasets, the efficiency issues can be addressed by the incorporated bagging technique in our BRDAD algorithm. On the theoretical side, we establish fast convergence rates of the AUC regret of our algorithm and demonstrate that the bagging technique significantly reduces the computational complexity. On the practical side, we conduct numerical experiments to illustrate the insensitivity of the parameter selection of our algorithm compared with other state-of-the-art distance-based methods. Furthermore, our method achieves superior performance on real-world datasets with the introduced bagging technique compared to other approaches. Yuchao Cai, Hanfang Yang, Yuheng Ma 0001, Hanyuan Hang |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2024 | Better Locally Private Sparse Estimation Given Multiple Samples Per UserabstractPrevious studies yielded discouraging results for item-level locally differentially private linear regression with $s$-sparsity assumption, where the minimax rate for $nm$ samples is $\mathcal{O}(sd / nm\varepsilon^2)$. This can be challenging for high-dimensional data, where the dimension $d$ is extremely large. In this work, we investigate user-level locally differentially private sparse linear regression. We show that with $n$ users each contributing $m$ samples, the linear dependency of dimension $d$ can be eliminated, yielding an error upper bound of $\mathcal{O}(s/ nm\varepsilon^2)$. We propose a framework that first selects candidate variables and then conducts estimation in the narrowed low-dimensional space, which is extendable to general sparse estimation problems with tight error bounds. Experiments on both synthetic and real datasets demonstrate the superiority of the proposed methods. Both the theoretical and empirical results suggest that, with the same number of samples, locally private sparse estimation is better conducted when multiple samples per user are available. Yuheng Ma 0001, Ke Jia, Hanfang Yang |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Optimal Locally Private Nonparametric Classification with Public DataabstractIn this work, we investigate the problem of public data assisted non-interactive Local Differentially Private (LDP) learning with a focus on non-parametric classification. Under the posterior drift assumption, we for the first time derive the mini-max optimal convergence rate with LDP constraint. Then, we present a novel approach, the locally differentially private classification tree, which attains the mini-max optimal convergence rate. Furthermore, we design a data-driven pruning procedure that avoids parameter tuning and provides a fast converging estimator. Comprehensive experiments conducted on synthetic and real data sets show the superior performance of our proposed methods. Both our theoretical and experimental findings demonstrate the effectiveness of public data compared to private data, which leads to practical suggestions for prioritizing non-private data collection. Yuheng Ma 0001, Hanfang Yang |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2023 | Extrapolated Random Tree for RegressionabstractIn this paper, we propose a novel tree-based algorithm named *Extrapolated Random Tree for Regression* (ERTR) that adapts to arbitrary smoothness of the regression function while maintaining the interpretability of the tree. We first put forward the *homothetic random tree for regression* (HRTR) that converges to the target function as the homothetic ratio approaches zero. Then ERTR uses a linear regression model to extrapolate HRTR estimations with different ratios to the ratio zero. From the theoretical perspective, we for the first time establish the optimal convergence rates for ERTR when the target function resides in the general Hölder space $C^{k,\alpha}$ for $k\in \mathbb{N}$, whereas the lower bound of the convergence rate of the random tree for regression (RTR) is strictly slower than ERTR in the space $C^{k,\alpha}$ for $k\geq 1$. This shows that ERTR outperforms RTR for the target function with high-order smoothness due to the extrapolation. In the experiments, we compare ERTR with state-of-the-art tree algorithms on real datasets to show the superior performance of our model. Moreover, promising improvements are brought by using the extrapolated trees as base learners in the extension of ERTR to ensemble methods. Yuchao Cai, Yuheng Ma 0001, Hanfang Yang |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | Decision Tree for Locally Private Estimation with Public DataabstractWe propose conducting locally differentially private (LDP) estimation with the aid of a small amount of public data to enhance the performance of private estimation. Specifically, we introduce an efficient algorithm called Locally differentially Private Decision Tree (LPDT) for LDP regression. We first use the public data to grow a decision tree partition and then fit an estimator according to the partition privately. From a theoretical perspective, we show that LPDT is $\varepsilon$-LDP and has a mini-max optimal convergence rate under a mild assumption of similarity between public and private data, whereas the lower bound of the convergence rate of LPDT without public data is strictly slower, which implies that the public data helps to improve the convergence rates of LDP estimation. We conduct experiments on both synthetic and real-world data to demonstrate the superior performance of LPDT compared with other state-of-the-art LDP regression methods. Moreover, we show that LPDT remains effective despite considerable disparities between public and private data. Yuheng Ma 0001, Yuchao Cai, Hanfang Yang |
NeurIPS | 1 |