Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Selwyn Gomes

dblp:258/1124 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 52% Learning theory · 26% Generative modeling · 22%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 61% Computational complexity · 30% Algorithms and data structures · 9%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit
0.512021
Lenient Regret and Good-Action Identification in Gaussian Process Bandits · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › non-parametric bandit
gaussian process bandits
0.512021
Lenient Regret and Good-Action Identification in Gaussian Process Bandits · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
regret bounds
0.512021
Lenient Regret and Good-Action Identification in Gaussian Process Bandits · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative prior
0.412020
Sample Complexity Bounds for 1-bit Compressive Sensing and Binary Stable Embeddings with Generative Priors · ICML 2020
Information theory › signal processing
compressed sensing
0.412020
Sample Complexity Bounds for 1-bit Compressive Sensing and Binary Stable Embeddings with Generative Priors · ICML 2020
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
one-bit compressed sensing
0.412020
Sample Complexity Bounds for 1-bit Compressive Sensing and Binary Stable Embeddings with Generative Priors · ICML 2020
Computational complexity › learning theory
sample complexity
0.412020
Sample Complexity Bounds for 1-bit Compressive Sensing and Binary Stable Embeddings with Generative Priors · ICML 2020
Algorithms and data structures
embedding
0.112020
Sample Complexity Bounds for 1-bit Compressive Sensing and Binary Stable Embeddings with Generative Priors · ICML 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lower bound analysis · 0.9lipschitz continuous generative model · 0.9gaussian measurements · 0.9gaussian process upper confidence bound · 0.5elimination algorithm · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Lenient Regret and Good-Action Identification in Gaussian Process Bandits
abstract
In this paper, we study the problem of Gaussian process (GP) bandits under relaxed optimization criteria stating that any function value above a certain threshold is “good enough”. On the theoretical side, we study various {\em lenient regret} notions in which all near-optimal actions incur zero penalty, and provide upper bounds on the lenient regret for GP-UCB and an elimination algorithm, circumventing the usual $O(\sqrt{T})$ term (with time horizon $T$) resulting from zooming extremely close towards the function maximum. In addition, we complement these upper bounds with algorithm-independent lower bounds. On the practical side, we consider the problem of finding a single “good action” according to a known pre-specified threshold, and introduce several good-action identification algorithms that exploit knowledge of the threshold. We experimentally find that such algorithms can typically find a good action faster than standard optimization-based approaches.
Selwyn Gomes, Jonathan Scarlett
ICML2
2020 Sample Complexity Bounds for 1-bit Compressive Sensing and Binary Stable Embeddings with Generative Priors
abstract
The goal of standard 1-bit compressive sensing is to accurately recover an unknown sparse vector from binary-valued measurements, each indicating the sign of a linear function of the vector. Motivated by recent advances in compressive sensing with generative models, where a generative modeling assumption replaces the usual sparsity assumption, we study the problem of 1-bit compressive sensing with generative models. We first consider noiseless 1-bit measurements, and provide sample complexity bounds for approximate recovery under i.i.d. Gaussian measurements and a Lipschitz continuous generative prior, as well as a near-matching algorithm-independent lower bound. Moreover, we demonstrate that the Binary $\epsilon$-Stable Embedding property, which characterizes the robustness of the reconstruction to measurement errors and noise, also holds for 1-bit compressive sensing with Lipschitz continuous generative models with sufficiently many Gaussian measurements. In addition, we apply our results to neural network generative models, and provide a proof-of-concept numerical experiment demonstrating significant improvements over sparsity-based approaches.
Zhaoqiang Liu, Selwyn Gomes, Avtansh Tiwari, Jonathan Scarlett
ICML2