Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tianjiao Yu
dblp:258/2012
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2530-9296ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 50% Vision and language · 25% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Web and social media mining · 50% Data mining · 50% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation
co-segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CALICO: Part-Focused Semantic Co-Segmentation with Large Vision-Language Models · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › AI safety
safety alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PurpCode: Reasoning for Safer Code Generation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CALICO: Part-Focused Semantic Co-Segmentation with Large Vision-Language Models · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CALICO: Part-Focused Semantic Co-Segmentation with Large Vision-Language Models · CVPR 2025 |
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PurpCode: Reasoning for Safer Code Generation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PurpCode: Reasoning for Safer Code Generation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Program synthesis and code generation › code generation with language models
secure code generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PurpCode: Reasoning for Safer Code Generation · NeurIPS 2025 |
Web and social media mining
social network analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sedition Hunters: A Quantitative Study of the Crowdsourced Investigation into the 2021 U.S. Capitol Attack · WWW 2023 |
Data mining › text mining
topic modeling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sedition Hunters: A Quantitative Study of the Crowdsourced Investigation into the 2021 U.S. Capitol Attack · WWW 2023 |
Usability and user experience research › evaluation methodology
crowdsourced evaluation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Sedition Hunters: A Quantitative Study of the Crowdsourced Investigation into the 2021 U.S. Capitol Attack · WWW 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rule learning · 2.6reinforcement learning · 2.6red-teaming · 1.7topic modeling · 1.3social network analysis · 1.3red teaming · 0.9parameter-efficient fine-tuning · 0.9large vision-language model · 0.9correspondence extraction · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | CALICO: Part-Focused Semantic Co-Segmentation with Large Vision-Language ModelsabstractRecent advances in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have enabled general-purpose vision tasks through visual instruction tuning. While existing LVLMs can generate segmentation masks from text prompts for single images, they struggle with segmentation-grounded reasoning across images, especially at finer granularities such as object parts. In this paper, we introduce the new task of part-focused semantic co-segmentation, which involves identifying and segmenting common objects and their constituent common and unique parts across images. To address this task, we present Calico, the first LVLM designed for multi-image part-level reasoning segmentation. Calico features two key components, a novel Correspondence Extraction Module that identifies semantic part-level correspondences, and Correspondence Adaptation Modules that embed this information into the LVLM to facilitate multi-image understanding in a parameter-efficient manner. To support training and evaluation, we curate MixedParts, a large-scale multi-image segmentation dataset containing ∼2.4M samples across ∼44K images spanning diverse object and part categories. Experimental results demonstrate that Calico, with just 0.3% of its parameters finetuned, achieves strong performance on this challenging task. Kiet A. Nguyen, Adheesh Sunil Juvekar, Tianjiao Yu, Muntasir Wahed, Ismini Lourentzou |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2025 | PurpCode: Reasoning for Safer Code GenerationabstractWe introduce PurpCode, the first post-training recipe for training safe code reasoning models towards generating secure code and defending against malicious cyberactivities. PurpCode trains a reasoning model in two stages: (i) Rule Learning, which
explicitly teaches the model to reference cybersafety rules to generate vulnerability-free code and to avoid facilitating malicious cyberactivities; and (ii) Reinforcement Learning, which optimizes model safety and preserves model utility through diverse, multi-objective reward mechanisms. To empower the training pipelines with comprehensive cybersafety data, we conduct internal red-teaming to synthesize comprehensive and high-coverage prompts based on real-world tasks for inducing unsafe cyberactivities in the model. Based on PurpCode, we develop a reasoning-based coding model, namely PurpCode-32B, which demonstrates state-of-the-art cybersafety,
outperforming various frontier models. Moreover, our alignment method decreases the model overrefusal rates in both general and cybersafety-specific scenarios, while preserving model utility in both code generation and common security knowledge. Jiawei Liu 0004, Nirav Diwan, Haoyu Zhai, Xiaona Zhou, Kiet A. Nguyen, Tianjiao Yu, Muntasir Wahed, Yinlin Deng, Hadjer Benkraouda, Yuxiang Wei 0003, Lingming Zhang 0001, Ismini Lourentzou, Gang Wang 0011 |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2024 | Fine-Grained Alignment for Cross-Modal Recipe RetrievalabstractVision-language pre-trained models have exhibited significant advancements in various multimodal and unimodal tasks in recent years, including cross-modal recipe retrieval. However, a persistent challenge in multimodal frameworks is the lack of alignment between the encoders of different modalities. Although previous works addressed image and recipe embedding alignment, the alignment of individual recipe components has been overlooked. To address this gap, we present Fine-grained Alignment for Recipe eMbeddings (FARM), a cross-modal retrieval approach that aligns the encodings of recipe components, including titles, ingredients, and instructions, within a shared representation space alongside corresponding image embeddings. Moreover, we introduce a hyperbolic loss function to effectively capture the similarity information inherent in recipe classes. FARM improves Recall@1 by 1.4% for image-to-recipe and 1.0% for recipe-to-image retrieval. Additionally, FARM achieves up to 6.1% and 15.1% performance improvement in image-to-recipe retrieval tasks, when just one and two components of the recipe are available, respectively. Comprehensive qualitative analysis of retrieved images for various recipes showcases the semantic capabilities of our trained models. Code is available at https://github.com/PLAN-Lab/FARM. Muntasir Wahed, Xiaona Zhou, Tianjiao Yu, Ismini Lourentzou |
WACV | 3 |
| 2023 | Sedition Hunters: A Quantitative Study of the Crowdsourced Investigation into the 2021 U.S. Capitol AttackabstractSocial media platforms have enabled extremists to organize violent events, such as the 2021 U.S. Capitol Attack. Simultaneously, these platforms enable professional investigators and amateur sleuths to collaboratively collect and identify imagery of suspects with the goal of holding them accountable for their actions. Through a case study of Sedition Hunters, a Twitter community whose goal is to identify individuals who participated in the 2021 U.S. Capitol Attack, we explore what are the main topics or targets of the community, who participates in the community, and how. Using topic modeling, we find that information sharing is the main focus of the community. We also note an increase in awareness of privacy concerns. Furthermore, using social network analysis, we show how some participants played important roles in the community. Finally, we discuss implications for the content and structure of online crowdsourced investigations. Tianjiao Yu, Sukrit Venkatagiri, Ismini Lourentzou, Kurt Luther |
WWW | 1 |
| 2022 | Deep object detection for waterbird monitoring using aerial imageryabstractMonitoring of colonial waterbird nesting islands is essential to tracking waterbird population trends, which are used for evaluating ecosystem health and informing conservation management decisions. Recently, unmanned aerial vehicles, or drones, have emerged as a viable technology to precisely monitor waterbird colonies. However, manually counting waterbirds from hundreds, or potentially thousands, of aerial images is both difficult and time-consuming. In this work, we present a deep learning pipeline that can be used to precisely detect, count, and monitor waterbirds using aerial imagery collected by a commercial drone. By utilizing convolutional neural network-based object detectors, we show that we can detect 16 classes of waterbird species that are commonly found in colonial nesting islands along the Texas coast. Our experiments using Faster R-CNN and RetinaNet object detectors give mean interpolated average precision scores of 67.9% and 63.1% respectively. Krish Kabra, Alexander Xiong, Minxuan Luo, William Lu, Tianjiao Yu, Dhananjay Singh 0003, Raul Garcia, Maojie Tang, Hank Arnold, Anna Vallery, Richard Gibbons, Arko Barman |
ICMLA | 6 |