Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jemma C. Hopewell
dblp:258/2402
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-3870-8018ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
genetic association study |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Identifying small-effect genetic associations overlooked by the conventional fixed-effect model in a large-scale meta-analysis of coronary artery disease · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › genetic association study
genome-wide association study meta-analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Identifying small-effect genetic associations overlooked by the conventional fixed-effect model in a large-scale meta-analysis of coronary artery disease · Bioinform. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random-effects meta-analysis · 0.4forest plots · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Identifying small-effect genetic associations overlooked by the conventional fixed-effect model in a large-scale meta-analysis of coronary artery diseaseabstractMOTIVATION: Common small-effect genetic variants that contribute to human complex traits and disease are typically identified using traditional fixed-effect (FE) meta-analysis methods. However, the power to detect genetic associations under FE models deteriorates with increasing heterogeneity, so that some small-effect heterogeneous loci might go undetected. A modified random-effects meta-analysis approach (RE2) was previously developed that is more powerful than traditional fixed and random-effects methods at detecting small-effect heterogeneous genetic associations, the method was updated (RE2C) to identify small-effect heterogeneous variants overlooked by traditional fixed-effect meta-analysis. Here, we re-appraise a large-scale meta-analysis of coronary disease with RE2C to search for small-effect genetic signals potentially masked by heterogeneity in a FE meta-analysis. RESULTS: Our application of RE2C suggests a high sensitivity but low specificity of this approach for discovering small-effect heterogeneous genetic associations. We recommend that reports of small-effect heterogeneous loci discovered with RE2C are accompanied by forest plots and standardized predicted random-effects statistics to reveal the distribution of genetic effect estimates across component studies of meta-analyses, highlighting overly influential outlier studies with the potential to inflate genetic signals. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Scripts to calculate standardized predicted random-effects statistics and generate forest plots are available in the getspres R package entitled from https://magosil86.github.io/getspres/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Lerato E. Magosi, Anuj Goel, Jemma C. Hopewell |
Bioinform. | 3 |