MOTIVATION: Cancer progresses through the accumulation of genomic events. Cancer progression models such as Mutual Hazard Networks (MHNs) describe this dynamic, enabling prediction of temporal event positions and patient-specific risks of acquiring mutations. However, current MHN analyses rely on single most likely models and do not quantify the uncertainty inherent to parameter estimation. Assessing forecast stability is essential before using them to anticipate treatment-relevant mutations, adapt targeted therapies, or prioritize monitoring of patients at elevated progression risk. RESULTS: We address a key prerequisite for the responsible clinical use of cancer progression models by making MHN-derived predictions uncertainty-aware. We present a Bayesian framework for MHN that uses Markov Chain Monte Carlo to sample from the posterior distributions of model parameters and derived predictions. For practical use we implemented the Random-Walk Metropolis, Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm (MALA), and simplified manifold MALA samplers as part of the existing mhn Python package. Only MALA and smMALA were successful in sampling from MHN posteriors, with MALA performing best. While most MHN parameters and predictions showed low posterior variance, a small subset displayed greater variability across the posterior distribution. This differentiation cannot be obtained from a single most likely model, emphasizing the need for uncertainty quantification, especially in clinical contexts. As an illustrative example, posterior sampling identified a subgroup of STK11$-$, KRAS$+$ lung adenocarcinoma patients with a high predicted short-term risk-with low variance across posterior samples-to develop an STK11 mutation. This subgroup exhibited poorer survival under immunotherapy, resembling patterns observed in STK11+ patients. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our implementation is part of version 1.2.0 of the mhn package (https://github.com/spang-lab/LearnMHN). All analyses including the code to produce all figures in this article can be found under https://github.com/huy29433/MCMC-sampling-for-MHN (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21160219).

MOTIVATION: Metastasis formation is a hallmark of cancer lethality. Yet, metastases are generally unobservable during their early stages of dissemination and spread to distant organs. Genomic datasets of matched primary tumors and metastases may offer insights into the underpinnings and the dynamics of metastasis formation. RESULTS: We present metMHN, a cancer progression model designed to deduce the joint progression of primary tumors and metastases using cross-sectional cancer genomics data. The model elucidates the statistical dependencies among genomic events, the formation of metastasis, and the clinical emergence of both primary tumors and their metastatic counterparts. metMHN enables the chronological reconstruction of mutational sequences and facilitates estimation of the timing of metastatic seeding. In a study of nearly 5000 lung adenocarcinomas, metMHN pinpointed TP53 and EGFR as mediators of metastasis formation. Furthermore, the study revealed that post-seeding adaptation is predominantly influenced by frequent copy number alterations. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All datasets and code are available on GitHub at https://github.com/cbg-ethz/metMHN.

MOTIVATION: Cancer progresses by accumulating genomic events, such as mutations and copy number alterations, whose chronological order is key to understanding the disease but difficult to observe. Instead, cancer progression models use co-occurrence patterns in cross-sectional data to infer epistatic interactions between events and thereby uncover their most likely order of occurrence. State-of-the-art progression models, however, are limited by mathematical tractability and only allow events to interact in directed acyclic graphs, to promote but not inhibit subsequent events, or to be mutually exclusive in distinct groups that cannot overlap. RESULTS: Here we propose Mutual Hazard Networks (MHN), a new Machine Learning algorithm to infer cyclic progression models from cross-sectional data. MHN model events by their spontaneous rate of fixation and by multiplicative effects they exert on the rates of successive events. MHN compared favourably to acyclic models in cross-validated model fit on four datasets tested. In application to the glioblastoma dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas, MHN proposed a novel interaction in line with consecutive biopsies: IDH1 mutations are early events that promote subsequent fixation of TP53 mutations. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Implementation and data are available at https://github.com/RudiSchill/MHN. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.