Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jonathan Bunton
dblp:258/3436
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-0051-3394ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 2 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 59% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 32% Automated reasoning and model checking · 10% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Network optimization and economics · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Network optimization and economics › network design
network synthesis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Synthesis of Large-Scale Instant IoT Networks · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
mixed integer linear programming |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Synthesis of Large-Scale Instant IoT Networks · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2023 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › switching theory
network synthesis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Synthesis of Large-Scale Instant IoT Networks · IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
submodular function minimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Joint Continuous and Discrete Model Selection via Submodularity · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
robust optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Joint Continuous and Discrete Model Selection via Submodularity · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
satisfiability modulo convex optimization · 1.3mixed integer linear programming · 1.3hierarchical synthesis · 1.3submodularity · 1.1robust optimization · 1.1discrete optimization · 1.1continuous optimization · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Synthesis of Large-Scale Instant IoT NetworksabstractWhile most networks have long lifetimes, temporary network infrastructure is often useful for special events, pop-up retail, or disaster response. Aninstant IoTnetwork is one that is rapidly constructed, used for a few days, then dismantled. We consider the synthesis of instant IoT networks in urban settings. This synthesis problem must satisfy complex and competing constraints: sensor coverage, line-of-sight visibility, and network connectivity. The central challenge in our synthesis problem is quicklyscalingto large regions while producing cost-effective solutions. We explore two qualitatively different representations of the synthesis problems using satisfiability modulo convex optimization (SMC), and mixed-integer linear programming (MILP). The former is more expressive, for our problem, than the latter, but is less well-suited for solving optimization problems like ours. We show how to express our network synthesis in these frameworks. To scale to problem sizes beyond what these frameworks are capable of, we develop ahierarchical synthesistechnique that independently synthesizes networks in sub-regions of the deployment area, then combines these. We find that, while MILP outperforms SMC in some settings for smaller problem sizes, the fact that SMC's expressivity matches our problem ensures that it uniformly generates better quality solutions at larger problem sizes. Pradipta Ghosh, Jonathan Bunton, Dimitrios Pylorof, Marcos A. M. Vieira, Kevin S. Chan, Ramesh Govindan, Gaurav S. Sukhatme, Paulo Tabuada, Gunjan Verma |
IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. | 2 |
| 2022 | Joint Continuous and Discrete Model Selection via SubmodularityabstractIn model selection problems for machine learning, the desire for a well-performing model with meaningful structure is typically expressed through a regularized optimization problem. In many scenarios, however, the meaningful structure is specified in some discrete space, leading to difficult nonconvex optimization problems. In this paper, we connect the model selection problem with structure-promoting regularizers to submodular function minimization with continuous and discrete arguments. In particular, we leverage the theory of submodular functions to identify a class of these problems that can be solved exactly and efficiently with an agnostic combination of discrete and continuous optimization routines. We show how simple continuous or discrete constraints can also be handled for certain problem classes and extend these ideas to a robust optimization framework. We also show how some problems outside of this class can be embedded into the class, further extending the class of problems our framework can accommodate. Finally, we numerically validate our theoretical results with several proof-of-concept examples with synthetic and real-world data, comparing against state-of-the-art algorithms. Jonathan Bunton, Paulo Tabuada |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2020 | Rapid Top-Down Synthesis of Large-Scale IoT NetworksabstractAdvances in optimization and constraint satisfaction techniques, together with the availability of elastic computing resources, have spurred interest in large-scale network verification and synthesis. Motivated by this, we consider the top-down synthesis of ad-hoc IoT networks for disaster response and search and rescue operations. This synthesis problem must satisfy complex and competing constraints: sensor coverage, line-of-sight visibility, and network connectivity. The central challenge in our synthesis problem is quickly scaling to large regions while producing cost-effective solutions. We explore a representation of the synthesis problems using a novel constraint satisfaction paradigm, satisfiability modulo convex optimization (SMC). We choose SMC because it matches the expressivity needs for our network synthesis. To scale to large problem sizes, we develop a hierarchical synthesis technique that independently synthesizes networks in sub-regions of the deployment area, then combines these. Our experiments show that SMC consistently generates better quality solutions than a baseline synthesis approach based on Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP). Pradipta Ghosh, Jonathan Bunton, Dimitrios Pylorof, Marcos A. M. Vieira, Kevin S. Chan, Ramesh Govindan, Gaurav S. Sukhatme, Paulo Tabuada, Gunjan Verma |
ICCCN | 2 |