Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yoochan Myung
dblp:258/3810
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-6763-9808ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis
protein-protein interaction |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | CSM-AB: graph-based antibody-antigen binding affinity prediction and docking scoring function · Bioinform. 2022 mCSM-AB2: guiding rational antibody design using graph-based signatures · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Understanding the complementarity and plasticity of antibody-antigen interfaces · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein-protein interaction prediction
antibody-antigen binding affinity prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CSM-AB: graph-based antibody-antigen binding affinity prediction and docking scoring function · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › molecular modeling › molecular docking
docking scoring function |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CSM-AB: graph-based antibody-antigen binding affinity prediction and docking scoring function · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | CSM-AB: graph-based antibody-antigen binding affinity prediction and docking scoring function · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
antibody affinity maturation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | mCSM-AB2: guiding rational antibody design using graph-based signatures · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
drug discovery |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | EasyVS: a user-friendly web-based tool for molecule library selection and structure-based virtual screening · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein engineering |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | mCSM-AB2: guiding rational antibody design using graph-based signatures · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery › virtual screening
structure-based virtual screening |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | EasyVS: a user-friendly web-based tool for molecule library selection and structure-based virtual screening · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
variant effect prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | mCSM-AB2: guiding rational antibody design using graph-based signatures · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
virtual screening |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | EasyVS: a user-friendly web-based tool for molecule library selection and structure-based virtual screening · Bioinform. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph-based signatures · 1.0interatomic interaction analysis · 0.7concavity analysis · 0.7machine learning · 0.6molecular similarity clustering · 0.4evolutionary terms · 0.4energetic terms · 0.4docking · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Understanding the complementarity and plasticity of antibody-antigen interfacesabstractMOTIVATION: While antibodies have been ground-breaking therapeutic agents, the structural determinants for antibody binding specificity remain to be fully elucidated, which is compounded by the virtually unlimited repertoire of antigens they can recognize. Here, we have explored the structural landscapes of antibody-antigen interfaces to identify the structural determinants driving target recognition by assessing concavity and interatomic interactions. RESULTS: We found that complementarity-determining regions utilized deeper concavity with their longer H3 loops, especially H3 loops of nanobody showing the deepest use of concavity. Of all amino acid residues found in complementarity-determining regions, tryptophan used deeper concavity, especially in nanobodies, making it suitable for leveraging concave antigen surfaces. Similarly, antigens utilized arginine to bind to deeper pockets of the antibody surface. Our findings fill a gap in knowledge about the antibody specificity, binding affinity, and the nature of antibody-antigen interface features, which will lead to a better understanding of how antibodies can be more effective to target druggable sites on antigen surfaces. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The data and scripts are available at: https://github.com/YoochanMyung/scripts. Yoochan Myung, Douglas E. V. Pires, David B. Ascher |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2022 | epitope3D: a machine learning method for conformational B-cell epitope predictionabstractThe ability to identify antigenic determinants of pathogens, or epitopes, is fundamental to guide rational vaccine development and immunotherapies, which are particularly relevant for rapid pandemic response. A range of computational tools has been developed over the past two decades to assist in epitope prediction; however, they have presented limited performance and generalization, particularly for the identification of conformational B-cell epitopes. Here, we present epitope3D, a novel scalable machine learning method capable of accurately identifying conformational epitopes trained and evaluated on the largest curated epitope data set to date. Our method uses the concept of graph-based signatures to model epitope and non-epitope regions as graphs and extract distance patterns that are used as evidence to train and test predictive models. We show epitope3D outperforms available alternative approaches, achieving Mathew's Correlation Coefficient and F1-scores of 0.55 and 0.57 on cross-validation and 0.45 and 0.36 during independent blind tests, respectively. Bruna Moreira da Silva, Yoochan Myung, David B. Ascher, Douglas E. V. Pires |
Briefings Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2022 | CSM-AB: graph-based antibody-antigen binding affinity prediction and docking scoring functionabstractMOTIVATION: Understanding antibody-antigen interactions is key to improving their binding affinities and specificities. While experimental approaches are fundamental for developing new therapeutics, computational methods can provide quick assessment of binding landscapes, guiding experimental design. Despite this, little effort has been devoted to accurately predicting the binding affinity between antibodies and antigens and to develop tailored docking scoring functions for this type of interaction. Here, we developed CSM-AB, a machine learning method capable of predicting antibody-antigen binding affinity by modelling interaction interfaces as graph-based signatures. RESULTS: CSM-AB outperformed alternative methods achieving a Pearson's correlation of up to 0.64 on blind tests. We also show CSM-AB can accurately rank near-native poses, working effectively as a docking scoring function. We believe CSM-AB will be an invaluable tool to assist in the development of new immunotherapies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: CSM-AB is freely available as a user-friendly web interface and API at http://biosig.unimelb.edu.au/csm_ab/datasets. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Yoochan Myung, Douglas E. V. Pires, David B. Ascher |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2020 | mCSM-AB2: guiding rational antibody design using graph-based signaturesabstractMOTIVATION: A lack of accurate computational tools to guide rational mutagenesis has made affinity maturation a recurrent challenge in antibody (Ab) development. We previously showed that graph-based signatures can be used to predict the effects of mutations on Ab binding affinity. RESULTS: Here we present an updated and refined version of this approach, mCSM-AB2, capable of accurately modelling the effects of mutations on Ab-antigen binding affinity, through the inclusion of evolutionary and energetic terms. Using a new and expanded database of over 1800 mutations with experimental binding measurements and structural information, mCSM-AB2 achieved a Pearson's correlation of 0.73 and 0.77 across training and blind tests, respectively, outperforming available methods currently used for rational Ab engineering. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: mCSM-AB2 is available as a user-friendly and freely accessible web server providing rapid analysis of both individual mutations or the entire binding interface to guide rational antibody affinity maturation at http://biosig.unimelb.edu.au/mcsm_ab2. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Yoochan Myung, Carlos H. M. Rodrigues, David B. Ascher, Douglas E. V. Pires |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2020 | EasyVS: a user-friendly web-based tool for molecule library selection and structure-based virtual screeningabstractSUMMARY: EasyVS is a web-based platform built to simplify molecule library selection and virtual screening. With an intuitive interface, the tool allows users to go from selecting a protein target with a known structure and tailoring a purchasable molecule library to performing and visualizing docking in a few clicks. Our system also allows users to filter screening libraries based on molecule properties, cluster molecules by similarity and personalize docking parameters. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: EasyVS is freely available as an easy-to-use web interface at http://biosig.unimelb.edu.au/easyvs. CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Douglas E. V. Pires, Wandré N. P. Veloso, Yoochan Myung, Carlos H. M. Rodrigues, Michael Silk, Pâmela M. Rezende, Francislon Silva, Joicymara S. Xavier, João P. L. Velloso, Carlos H. Silveira, David B. Ascher |
Bioinform. | 3 |