Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chris Birmingham
dblp:258/5001
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers |
Human-robot interaction · 60% User interface design and tools · 16% Human-AI interaction · 16% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 62% Robot navigation and mapping · 19% Speech recognition and synthesis · 19% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
visual attention |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Group-Level Focus of Visual Attention for Improved Next Speaker Prediction · ACM Multimedia 2021 |
Human-robot interaction
multi-party interaction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Group-Level Focus of Visual Attention for Improved Next Speaker Prediction · ACM Multimedia 2021 |
Human-AI interaction
next speaker prediction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Group-Level Focus of Visual Attention for Improved Next Speaker Prediction · ACM Multimedia 2021 |
Human-robot interaction
social human-robot interaction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Composing HARMONI: An Open-source Tool for Human and Robot Modular OpeN Interaction · ICRA 2021 |
Human-robot interaction › social robot
group interaction with robots |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Can I Trust You? A User Study of Robot Mediation of a Support Group · ICRA 2020 |
Human-robot interaction › assistive robotics
socially assistive robotics |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Can I Trust You? A User Study of Robot Mediation of a Support Group · ICRA 2020 |
Collaborative and social computing › social interaction
group dynamics |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Can I Trust You? A User Study of Robot Mediation of a Support Group · ICRA 2020 |
Collaborative and social computing › computer-mediated communication
interpersonal trust |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Can I Trust You? A User Study of Robot Mediation of a Support Group · ICRA 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
node orchestration · 1.0multimodal fusion · 1.0machine learning · 1.0decision management · 1.0ROS · 1.0user study · 0.4dyadic trust scale · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Composing HARMONI: An Open-source Tool for Human and Robot Modular OpeN InteractionabstractThe research and development of socially interactive robots is a complex challenge because of the wide variety of capabilities needed for effective social human-robot interactions (HRI). Many of these capabilities, including perception, dialog, and control, have state of the art methods and solutions, but combining those into a comprehensive and seamless interaction is still an open challenge. We describe HARMONI, a multi-modal, open-source tool for rapid social HRI development and deployment. HARMONI is centered around a ROS package for interaction development, including decision management and node orchestration. HARMONI systematically integrates with disparate functionalities needed to conduct a meaningful social human-robot interaction such as external cloud services, AI models, and modules for sensing, planning, and acting on a variety of platforms. HARMONI was applied to the QT robot platform and usability tests were conducted to evaluate the ease and speed of development and deployment. This paper describes the architecture and design of HARMONI and reports the results of a pilot study with novice users. Micol Spitale, Chris Birmingham, R. Michael Swan, Maja J. Mataric |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2021 | Group-Level Focus of Visual Attention for Improved Next Speaker PredictionabstractIn this work we address the Next Speaker Prediction sub challenge of the ACM '21 MultiMediate Grand Challenge. This challenge poses the problem of turn taking prediction in physically situated multiparty interaction. Solving this problem is essential for enabling fluent real-time multiparty human-machine interaction. This problem is made more difficult by the need for a robust solution that can perform effectively across a wide variety of settings and contexts. Prior work has shown that current state-of-the-art methods rely on machine learning approaches that do not generalize well to new settings and feature distributions. To address this problem, we propose the use of group-level focus of visual attention as additional information. We show that a simple combination of group-level focus of visual attention features and publicly available audio-video synchronizer models is competitive with state-of-the-art methods fine-tuned for the challenge dataset. Chris Birmingham, Kalin Stefanov, Maja J. Mataric |
ACM Multimedia | 1 |
| 2020 | Can I Trust You? A User Study of Robot Mediation of a Support GroupabstractSocially assistive robots have the potential to improve group dynamics when interacting with groups of people in social settings. This work contributes to the understanding of those dynamics through a user study of trust dynamics in the novel context of a robot mediated support group. For this study, a novel framework for robot mediation of a support group was developed and validated. To evaluate interpersonal trust in the multi-party setting, a dyadic trust scale was implemented and found to be uni-factorial, validating it as an appropriate measure of general trust. The results of this study demonstrate a significant increase in average interpersonal trust after the group interaction session, and qualitative post-session interview data report that participants found the interaction helpful and successfully supported and learned from one other. The results of the study validate that a robot-mediated support group can improve trust among strangers and allow them to share and receive support for their academic stress. Chris Birmingham, Zijian Hu 0001, Kartik Mahajan, Eli Reber, Maja J. Mataric |
ICRA | 1 |