EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yunqian Fan
dblp:258/6134
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0009-8238-6595ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 80% Language models and text generation · 17% Autonomous driving · 4% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 61% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 21% Performance modeling and evaluation · 18% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Pushing the Limit of Post-Training Quantization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 Selective Focus: Investigating Semantics Sensitivity in Post-training Quantization for Lane Detection · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization
post-training quantization |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Pushing the Limit of Post-Training Quantization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 Selective Focus: Investigating Semantics Sensitivity in Post-training Quantization for Lane Detection · AAAI 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model inference |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | PiLLM: Resource-Efficient LLM Inference Using Workload Prediction · EuroSys 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
resource allocation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | PiLLM: Resource-Efficient LLM Inference Using Workload Prediction · EuroSys 2026 |
Machine learning and data management
inference serving |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Past-Future Scheduler for LLM Serving under SLA Guarantees · ASPLOS (2) 2025 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
inference serving |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Past-Future Scheduler for LLM Serving under SLA Guarantees · ASPLOS (2) 2025 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU resource management |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | PiLLM: Resource-Efficient LLM Inference Using Workload Prediction · EuroSys 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization
mixed-precision quantization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Pushing the Limit of Post-Training Quantization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception › vision-based perception
lane detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Selective Focus: Investigating Semantics Sensitivity in Post-training Quantization for Lane Detection · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
quantization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Selective Focus: Investigating Semantics Sensitivity in Post-training Quantization for Lane Detection · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
workload prediction · 2.0dynamic resource allocation · 2.0past-future scheduling · 1.7memory requirement estimation · 1.7quantization-aware training comparison · 0.9brecq · 0.9QDrop · 0.9sensitivity aware selection · 0.8semantic guided focus · 0.8post-training quantization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | PiLLM: Resource-Efficient LLM Inference Using Workload PredictionabstractLLM inference demands substantial GPU resources, but its highly variable workload characteristics create efficiency challenges at both inter-GPU and intra-GPU levels. To meet Service Level Objectives (SLOs), existing systems typically overprovision resources in two ways: allocating excess GPUs to handle peak loads and reserving excessive memory per request to prevent out-of-memory during token generation. We introduce PiLLM (Predictable inference for LLMs), a system that addresses these inefficiencies through accurate workload prediction and dynamic resource allocation. Yunqian Fan, Shihao Bai, Ruihao Gong, Zaijun Wang |
EuroSys | 1 |
| 2025 | Past-Future Scheduler for LLM Serving under SLA GuaranteesabstractThe exploration and application of Large Language Models (LLMs) is thriving. To reduce deployment costs, continuous batching has become an essential feature in current service frameworks. The effectiveness of continuous batching relies on an accurate estimate of the memory requirements of requests. However, due to the diversity in request output lengths, existing frameworks tend to adopt aggressive or conservative schedulers, which often result in significant overestimation or underestimation of memory consumption. Consequently, they suffer from harmful request evictions or prolonged queuing times, failing to achieve satisfactory throughput under strict Service Level Agreement (SLA) guarantees (a.k.a. goodput), across various LLM application scenarios with differing input-output length distributions. To address this issue, we propose a novel Past-Future scheduler that precisely estimates the peak memory resources required by the running batch via considering the historical distribution of request output lengths and calculating memory occupancy at each future time point. It adapts to applications with all types of input-output length distributions, balancing the trade-off between request queuing and harmful evictions, thereby consistently achieving better goodput. Furthermore, to validate the effectiveness of the proposed scheduler, we developed a high-performance LLM serving framework, LightLLM, that implements the Past-Future scheduler. Compared to existing aggressive or conservative schedulers, LightLLM demonstrates superior goodput, achieving up to 2-3× higher goodput than other schedulers under heavy loads. LightLLM is open source to boost the research in such direction (https://github.com/ModelTC/lightllm). Ruihao Gong, Shihao Bai, Siyu Wu 0001, Yunqian Fan, Zaijun Wang, Hailong Yang 0002, Xianglong Liu 0001 |
ASPLOS (2) | 4 |
| 2025 | Pushing the Limit of Post-Training QuantizationabstractRecently, post-training quantization (PTQ) has become the de facto way to produce efficient low-precision neural networks without long-time retraining. Despite its low cost, current PTQ works fail to succeed under the extremely low-bit setting. In this work, we delve into extremely low-bit quantization and construct a unified theoretical analysis, which provides an in-depth understanding of the reason for the failure of low-bit quantization. According to the theoretical study, we argue that the existing methods fail in low-bit schemes due to significant perturbation on weights and lack of consideration of activation quantization. To this end, we propose Brecq and QDrop to respectively solve these two challenges, based on which a Q-Limit framework is constructed. Then the Q-Limit framework is further extended to support a mixed precision quantization scheme. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that can push the limit of PTQ down to INT2. Extensive experiments on various handcrafted and searched neural architectures are conducted for both visual recognition/detection tasks and language processing tasks. Without bells and whistles, our PTQ framework can attain low-bit ResNet and MobileNetV2 comparable with quantization-aware training (QAT), establishing a new state-of-the-art for PTQ. Ruihao Gong, Xianglong Liu 0001, Yuhang Li 0001, Yunqian Fan, Xiuying Wei, Jinyang Guo 0002 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 4 |
| 2024 | Selective Focus: Investigating Semantics Sensitivity in Post-training Quantization for Lane DetectionabstractLane detection (LD) plays a crucial role in enhancing the L2+ capabilities of autonomous driving, capturing widespread attention. The Post-Processing Quantization (PTQ) could facilitate the practical application of LD models, enabling fast speeds and limited memories without labeled data. However, prior PTQ methods do not consider the complex LD outputs that contain physical semantics, such as offsets, locations, etc., and thus cannot be directly applied to LD models. In this paper, we pioneeringly investigate semantic sensitivity to post-processing for lane detection with a novel Lane Distortion Score. Moreover, we identify two main factors impacting the LD performance after quantization, namely intra-head sensitivity and inter-head sensitivity, where a small quantization error in specific semantics can cause significant lane distortion. Thus, we propose a Selective Focus framework deployed with Semantic Guided Focus and Sensitivity Aware Selection modules, to incorporate post-processing information into PTQ reconstruction. Based on the observed intra-head sensitivity, Semantic Guided Focus is introduced to prioritize foreground-related semantics using a practical proxy. For inter-head sensitivity, we present Sensitivity Aware Selection, efficiently recognizing influential prediction heads and refining the optimization objectives at runtime. Extensive experiments have been done on a wide variety of models including keypoint-, anchor-, curve-, and segmentation-based ones. Our method produces quantized models in minutes on a single GPU and can achieve 6.4\% F1 Score improvement on the CULane dataset. Code and supplementary statement can be found at https://github.com/PannenetsF/SelectiveFocus. Yunqian Fan, Xiuying Wei, Ruihao Gong, Yuqing Ma, Xiangguo Zhang, Xianglong Liu 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | A Market in Dream: the Rapid Development of Anonymous Cybercrime
Gengqian Zhou, Jianwei Zhuge, Yunqian Fan, Kun Du, Shuqiang Lu |
Mob. Networks Appl. | 3 |