Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Corentin Friedrich
dblp:258/6442
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 89% Learning theory · 11% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › certified robustness
lipschitz-constrained networks |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | DP-SGD Without Clipping: The Lipschitz Neural Network Way · ICLR 2024 Pay attention to your loss : understanding misconceptions about Lipschitz neural networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › conformal prediction
robust conformal prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Robust Conformal Prediction via Lipschitz-Bounded Networks · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
differentially private training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DP-SGD Without Clipping: The Lipschitz Neural Network Way · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › privacy
privacy-preserving machine learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DP-SGD Without Clipping: The Lipschitz Neural Network Way · ICLR 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DP-SGD Without Clipping: The Lipschitz Neural Network Way · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
neural network generalization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Pay attention to your loss : understanding misconceptions about Lipschitz neural networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Pay attention to your loss : understanding misconceptions about Lipschitz neural networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Robust Conformal Prediction via Lipschitz-Bounded Networks · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lipschitz constraint · 1.5DP-SGD · 1.5lipschitz-bounded networks · 0.9conformal prediction · 0.9wasserstein distance estimation · 0.6robustness metric · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Efficient Robust Conformal Prediction via Lipschitz-Bounded NetworksabstractConformal Prediction (CP) has proven to be an effective post-hoc method for improving the trustworthiness of neural networks by providing prediction sets with finite-sample guarantees. However, under adversarial attacks, classical conformal guarantees do not hold anymore: this problem is addressed in the field of Robust Conformal Prediction. Several methods have been proposed to provide robust CP sets with guarantees under adversarial perturbations, but, for large scale problems, these sets are either too large or the methods are too computationally demanding to be deployed in real life scenarios. In this work, we propose a new method that leverages Lipschitz-bounded networks to precisely and efficiently estimate robust CP sets. When combined with a 1-Lipschitz robust network, we demonstrate that our *lip-rcp* method outperforms state-of-the-art results in both the size of the robust CP sets and computational efficiency in medium and large-scale scenarios such as ImageNet. Taking a different angle, we also study vanilla CP under attack, and derive new worst-case coverage bounds of vanilla CP sets, which are valid simultaneously for all adversarial attack levels. Our *lip-rcp* method makes this second approach as efficient as vanilla CP while also allowing robustness guarantees. Thomas Massena, Léo Andéol, Thibaut Boissin, Franck Mamalet, Corentin Friedrich, Mathieu Serrurier, Sébastien Gerchinovitz |
ICML | 5 |
| 2025 | Conformal Prediction for Image Segmentation Using Morphological Prediction Sets
Luca Mossina, Corentin Friedrich |
MICCAI (4) | 2 |
| 2024 | DP-SGD Without Clipping: The Lipschitz Neural Network WayabstractState-of-the-art approaches for training Differentially Private (DP) Deep Neural Networks (DNN) face difficulties to estimate tight bounds on the sensitivity of the network's layers, and instead rely on a process of per-sample gradient clipping. This clipping process not only biases the direction of gradients but also proves costly both in memory consumption and in computation. To provide sensitivity bounds and bypass the drawbacks of the clipping process, we propose to rely on Lipschitz constrained networks. Our theoretical analysis reveals an unexplored link between the Lipschitz constant with respect to their input and the one with respect to their parameters. By bounding the Lipschitz constant of each layer with respect to its parameters, we prove that we can train these networks with privacy guarantees. Our analysis not only allows the computation of the aforementioned sensitivities at scale, but also provides guidance on how to maximize the gradient-to-noise ratio for fixed privacy guarantees. To facilitate the application of Lipschitz networks and foster robust and certifiable learning under privacy guarantees, we provide a Python package that implements building blocks allowing the construction and private training of such networks. Louis Béthune, Thomas Massena, Thibaut Boissin, Aurélien Bellet, Franck Mamalet, Yannick Prudent, Corentin Friedrich, Mathieu Serrurier, David Vigouroux |
ICLR | 7 |
| 2022 | Pay attention to your loss : understanding misconceptions about Lipschitz neural networksabstractLipschitz constrained networks have gathered considerable attention in the deep learning community, with usages ranging from Wasserstein distance estimation to the training of certifiably robust classifiers. However they remain commonly considered as less accurate, and their properties in learning are still not fully understood. In this paper we clarify the matter: when it comes to classification 1-Lipschitz neural networks enjoy several advantages over their unconstrained counterpart. First, we show that these networks are as accurate as classical ones, and can fit arbitrarily difficult boundaries. Then, relying on a robustness metric that reflects operational needs we characterize the most robust classifier: the WGAN discriminator. Next, we show that 1-Lipschitz neural networks generalize well under milder assumptions. Finally, we show that hyper-parameters of the loss are crucial for controlling the accuracy-robustness trade-off. We conclude that they exhibit appealing properties to pave the way toward provably accurate, and provably robust neural networks. Louis Béthune, Thibaut Boissin, Mathieu Serrurier, Franck Mamalet, Corentin Friedrich, Alberto González-Sanz |
NeurIPS | 5 |