Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Saber Fazliahmadi

dblp:259/0031 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 93% High-performance computing · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource provisioning
budget-constrained resource provisioning
0.412020
GRP-HEFT: A Budget-Constrained Resource Provisioning Scheme for Workflow Scheduling in IaaS Clouds · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2020
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource allocation
cloud resource allocation
0.412020
GRP-HEFT: A Budget-Constrained Resource Provisioning Scheme for Workflow Scheduling in IaaS Clouds · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2020
Cloud and datacenter computing
cluster resource management and scheduling
0.412020
GRP-HEFT: A Budget-Constrained Resource Provisioning Scheme for Workflow Scheduling in IaaS Clouds · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2020
Cloud and datacenter computing
workflow scheduling
0.412020
GRP-HEFT: A Budget-Constrained Resource Provisioning Scheme for Workflow Scheduling in IaaS Clouds · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2020
High-performance computing
scientific workflow
0.112020
GRP-HEFT: A Budget-Constrained Resource Provisioning Scheme for Workflow Scheduling in IaaS Clouds · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

particle swarm optimization · 0.4multiobjective ant colony system · 0.4heterogeneous earliest finish time · 0.4greedy resource provisioning · 0.4genetic algorithm · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 GRP-HEFT: A Budget-Constrained Resource Provisioning Scheme for Workflow Scheduling in IaaS Clouds
abstract
In Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) Clouds, users are charged to utilize cloud services according to a pay-per-use model. If users intend to run their workflow applications on cloud resources within a specific budget, they have to adjust their demands for cloud resources with respect to this budget. Although several scheduling approaches have introduced solutions to optimize the makespan of workflows on a set of heterogeneous IaaS cloud resources within a certain budget, the hourly-based cost model of some well-known cloud providers (e.g., Amazon EC2 Cloud) can easily lead to a higher makespan and some schedulers may not find any feasible solution. In this article, we propose a novel resource provisioning mechanism and a workflow scheduling algorithm, named Greedy Resource Provisioning and modified HEFT (GRP-HEFT), for minimizing the makespan of a given workflow subject to a budget constraint for the hourly-based cost model of modern IaaS clouds. As a resource provisioning mechanism, we propose a greedy algorithm which lists the instance types according to their efficiency rate. For our scheduler, we modified the HEFT algorithm to consider a budget limit. GRP-HEFT is compared against state-of-the-art workflow scheduling techniques, including MOACS (MultiObjective Ant Colony System), PSO (Particle Swarm Optimization), and GA (Genetic Algorithm). The experimental results demonstrate that GRP-HEFT outperforms GA, PSO, and MOACS for several well-known scientific workflow applications for different problem sizes on average by 13.64, 19.77, and 11.69 percent, respectively. Also in terms of time complexity, GRP-HEFT outperforms GA, PSO and MOACS.
Hamid Reza Faragardi, Mohammad Reza Saleh Sedghpour, Saber Fazliahmadi, Thomas Fahringer, Nayereh Rasouli
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.3