Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Linus Härenstam-Nielsen

dblp:259/2170 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-6863-4438ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
3D vision · 51% Segmentation and scene understanding · 24% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 17%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation
2.132025
Semantic Library Adaptation: LoRA Retrieval and Fusion for Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation · CVPR 2025
To Adapt or Not to Adapt? Real-Time Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation · ICCV 2023
Online Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation in Ever-Changing Conditions · ECCV (34) 2022
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera calibration
1.322025
PRaDA: Projective Radial Distortion Averaging · CVPR 2025
Optimal least-squares solution to the hand-eye calibration problem · CVPR 2020
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
open-vocabulary segmentation
0.912025
Semantic Library Adaptation: LoRA Retrieval and Fusion for Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
projective reconstruction
0.912025
PRaDA: Projective Radial Distortion Averaging · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › camera calibration
radial distortion calibration
0.912025
PRaDA: Projective Radial Distortion Averaging · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion
0.912025
PRaDA: Projective Radial Distortion Averaging · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
test-time adaptation
0.912025
Semantic Library Adaptation: LoRA Retrieval and Fusion for Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation · CVPR 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › surface reconstruction › neural surface reconstruction
neural implicit surface reconstruction
0.812024
DiffCD: A Symmetric Differentiable Chamfer Distance for Neural Implicit Surface Fitting · ECCV (73) 2024
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation
0.712023
To Adapt or Not to Adapt? Real-Time Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation · ICCV 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision › multi-view geometry › triangulation
multi-view triangulation
0.712023
Semidefinite Relaxations for Robust Multiview Triangulation · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › edge computing › on-device machine learning
on-device learning
0.712023
To Adapt or Not to Adapt? Real-Time Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation · ICCV 2023
Mathematical optimization
convex relaxation
0.712023
Semidefinite Relaxations for Robust Multiview Triangulation · CVPR 2023
Mathematical optimization › convex relaxation
semidefinite relaxation
0.712023
Semidefinite Relaxations for Robust Multiview Triangulation · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
online domain adaptation
0.612022
Online Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation in Ever-Changing Conditions · ECCV (34) 2022
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot calibration
hand-eye calibration
0.412020
Optimal least-squares solution to the hand-eye calibration problem · CVPR 2020
Computer vision › 3D vision
camera pose estimation
0.312025
PRaDA: Projective Radial Distortion Averaging · CVPR 2025
Mathematical optimization
least squares
0.112020
Optimal least-squares solution to the hand-eye calibration problem · CVPR 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semidefinite relaxation · 1.3hardware-aware back-propagation · 1.3convex relaxation · 1.3projective geometry · 0.9pairwise feature matching · 0.9distortion averaging · 0.9adapter fusion · 0.9LoRA retrieval · 0.9CLIP embedding · 0.9domain-shift detection · 0.7domain shift detection · 0.7dual quaternions · 0.4analytic solution · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Semantic Library Adaptation: LoRA Retrieval and Fusion for Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation
abstract
Open-vocabulary semantic segmentation models associate vision and text to label pixels from an undefined set of classes using textual queries, providing versatile performance on novel datasets. However, large shifts between training and test domains degrade their performance, requiring fine-tuning for effective real-world applications. We introduce Semantic Library Adaptation (SemLA), a novel framework for training-free, test-time domain adaptation. SemLA leverages a library of LoRA-based adapters indexed with CLIP embeddings, dynamically merging the most relevant adapters based on proximity to the target domain in the embedding space. This approach constructs an ad-hoc model tailored to each specific input without additional training. Our method scales efficiently, enhances explainability by tracking adapter contributions, and inherently protects data privacy, making it ideal for sensitive applications. Comprehensive experiments on a 20-domain benchmark built over 10 standard datasets demonstrate SemLA ’s superior adaptability and performance across diverse settings, establishing a new standard in domain adaptation for open-vocabulary semantic segmentation.
Reza Qorbani, Gianluca Villani, Theodoros Panagiotakopoulos, Marc Botet Colomer, Linus Härenstam-Nielsen, Mattia Segù, Pier Luigi Dovesi, Jussi Karlgren, Daniel Cremers, Federico Tombari, Matteo Poggi
CVPR5
2025 PRaDA: Projective Radial Distortion Averaging
abstract
We tackle the problem of automatic calibration of radially distorted cameras in challenging conditions. Accurately determining distortion parameters typically requires either 1) solving the full Structure from Motion (SfM) problem involving camera poses, 3D points, and the distortion parameters, which is only possible if many images with sufficient overlap are provided, or 2) relying heavily on learning-based methods that are comparatively less accurate. In this work, we demonstrate that distortion calibration can be decoupled from 3D reconstruction, maintaining the accuracy of SfM-based methods while avoiding many of the associated complexities. This is achieved by working in Projective space, where the geometry is unique up to a homography, which encapsulates all camera parameters except for distortion. Our proposed method, Projective Radial Distortion Averaging, averages multiple distortion estimates in a fully projective framework without creating 3d points and full bundle adjustment. By relying on pairwise projective relations, our methods support any feature-matching approaches without constructing point tracks across multiple images.
Daniil Sinitsyn, Linus Härenstam-Nielsen, Daniel Cremers
CVPR2
2024 DiffCD: A Symmetric Differentiable Chamfer Distance for Neural Implicit Surface Fitting
Linus Härenstam-Nielsen, Lu Sang, Abhishek Saroha, Nikita Araslanov, Daniel Cremers
ECCV (73)1
2023 Semidefinite Relaxations for Robust Multiview Triangulation
abstract
We propose an approach based on convex relaxations for certifiably optimal robust multiview triangulation. To this end, we extend existing relaxation approaches to non-robust multiview triangulation by incorporating a least squares cost function. We propose two formulations, one based on epipolar constraints and one based on fractional reprojection constraints. The first is lower dimensional and remains tight under moderate noise and outlier levels, while the second is higher dimensional and therefore slower but remains tight even under extreme noise and outlier levels. We demonstrate through extensive experiments that the proposed approaches allow us to compute provably optimal re-constructions even under significant noise and a large percentage of outliers.
Linus Härenstam-Nielsen, Niclas Zeller, Daniel Cremers
CVPR1
2023 To Adapt or Not to Adapt? Real-Time Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation
abstract
The goal of Online Domain Adaptation for semantic segmentation is to handle unforeseeable domain changes that occur during deployment, like sudden weather events. However, the high computational costs associated with brute-force adaptation make this paradigm unfeasible for real-world applications. In this paper we propose HAMLET, a Hardware-Aware Modular Least Expensive Training framework for real-time domain adaptation. Our approach includes a hardware-aware back-propagation orchestration agent (HAMT) and a dedicated domain-shift detector that enables active control over when and how the model is adapted (LT). Thanks to these advancements, our approach is capable of performing semantic segmentation while simultaneously adapting at more than 29FPS on a single consumer-grade GPU. Our framework’s encouraging accuracy and speed trade-off is demonstrated on OnDA and SHIFT benchmarks through experimental results.
Marc Botet Colomer, Pier Luigi Dovesi, Theodoros Panagiotakopoulos, Joao Frederico Carvalho, Linus Härenstam-Nielsen, Hossein Azizpour, Hedvig Kjellström, Daniel Cremers, Matteo Poggi
ICCV5
2022 Online Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation in Ever-Changing Conditions
Theodoros Panagiotakopoulos, Pier Luigi Dovesi, Linus Härenstam-Nielsen, Matteo Poggi
ECCV (34)3
2020 Optimal least-squares solution to the hand-eye calibration problem
abstract
We propose a least-squares formulation to the noisy hand-eye calibration problem using dual-quaternions, and introduce efficient algorithms to find the exact optimal solution, based on analytic properties of the problem, avoiding non-linear optimization. We further present simple analytic approximate solutions which provide remarkably good estimations compared to the exact solution. In addition, we show how to generalize our solution to account for a given extrinsic prior in the cost function. To the best of our knowledge our algorithm is the most efficient approach to optimally solve the hand-eye calibration problem.
Amit Dekel, Linus Härenstam-Nielsen, Sergio Caccamo
CVPR2