Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Achille Thin
dblp:259/3100
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 90% Generative modeling · 10% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
importance sampling |
1.6 | 3 | 2022 | BR-SNIS: Bias Reduced Self-Normalized Importance Sampling · NeurIPS 2022 NEO: Non Equilibrium Sampling on the Orbits of a Deterministic Transform · NeurIPS 2021 Monte Carlo Variational Auto-Encoders · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
monte carlo estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | BR-SNIS: Bias Reduced Self-Normalized Importance Sampling · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › importance sampling
annealed importance sampling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Monte Carlo Variational Auto-Encoders · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | NEO: Non Equilibrium Sampling on the Orbits of a Deterministic Transform · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
partition function estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | NEO: Non Equilibrium Sampling on the Orbits of a Deterministic Transform · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Monte Carlo Variational Auto-Encoders · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Monte Carlo Variational Auto-Encoders · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
multimodal sampling |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | NEO: Non Equilibrium Sampling on the Orbits of a Deterministic Transform · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
iterated sampling-importance-resampling · 1.1bias and variance bounds · 0.6sequential importance sampling · 0.5non-equilibrium orbits · 0.5importance sampling · 0.5conformal hamiltonian system · 0.5annealed importance sampling · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | BR-SNIS: Bias Reduced Self-Normalized Importance SamplingabstractImportance Sampling (IS) is a method for approximating expectations with respect to a target distribution using independent samples from a proposal distribution and the associated to importance weights. In many cases, the target distribution is known up to a normalization constant and self-normalized IS (SNIS) is then used. While the use of self-normalization can have a positive effect on the dispersion of the estimator, it introduces bias. In this work, we propose a new method BR-SNIS whose complexity is essentially the same as SNIS and which significantly reduces bias. This method is a wrapper, in the sense that it uses the same proposal samples and importance weights but makes a clever use of iterated sampling-importance-resampling (i-SIR) to form a bias-reduced version of the estimator. We derive the proposed algorithm with rigorous theoretical results, including novel bias, variance, and high-probability bounds. We illustrate our findings with numerical examples. Gabriel Cardoso 0001, Sergey Samsonov, Achille Thin, Eric Moulines, Jimmy Olsson |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Monte Carlo Variational Auto-EncodersabstractVariational auto-encoders (VAE) are popular deep latent variable models which are trained by maximizing an Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO). To obtain tighter ELBO and hence better variational approximations, it has been proposed to use importance sampling to get a lower variance estimate of the evidence. However, importance sampling is known to perform poorly in high dimensions. While it has been suggested many times in the literature to use more sophisticated algorithms such as Annealed Importance Sampling (AIS) and its Sequential Importance Sampling (SIS) extensions, the potential benefits brought by these advanced techniques have never been realized for VAE: the AIS estimate cannot be easily differentiated, while SIS requires the specification of carefully chosen backward Markov kernels. In this paper, we address both issues and demonstrate the performance of the resulting Monte Carlo VAEs on a variety of applications. Achille Thin, Nikita Kotelevskii, Arnaud Doucet, Alain Durmus, Eric Moulines, Maxim Panov |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | NEO: Non Equilibrium Sampling on the Orbits of a Deterministic TransformabstractSampling from a complex distribution $\pi$ and approximating its intractable normalizing constant $\mathrm{Z}$ are challenging problems. In this paper, a novel family of importance samplers (IS) and Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samplers is derived. Given an invertible map $\mathrm{T}$, these schemes combine (with weights) elements from the forward and backward Orbits through points sampled from a proposal distribution $\rho$. The map $\mathrm{T}$ does not leave the target $\pi$ invariant, hence the name NEO, standing for Non-Equilibrium Orbits. NEO-IS provides unbiased estimators of the normalizing constant and self-normalized IS estimators of expectations under $\pi$ while NEO-MCMC combines multiple NEO-IS estimates of the normalizing constant and an iterated sampling-importance resampling mechanism to sample from $\pi$. For $\mathrm{T}$ chosen as a discrete-time integrator of a conformal Hamiltonian system, NEO-IS achieves state-of-the art performance on difficult benchmarks and NEO-MCMC is able to explore highly multimodal targets. Additionally, we provide detailed theoretical results for both methods. In particular, we show that NEO-MCMC is uniformly geometrically ergodic and establish explicit mixing time estimates under mild conditions. Achille Thin, Yazid Janati El Idrissi, Sylvain Le Corff, Charles Ollion, Eric Moulines, Arnaud Doucet, Alain Durmus, Christian X. Robert |
NeurIPS | 1 |