Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anamay Chaturvedi
dblp:259/3132
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2023
0009-0006-2502-1221ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
5 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 42% Mathematical optimization · 39% Approximation and online algorithms · 20% | |
| Network and information security
4 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
1.5 | 4 | 2023 | Streaming Submodular Maximization with Differential Privacy · ICML 2023 Differentially Private k-Means via Exponential Mechanism and Max Cover · AAAI 2021 Locally Private k-Means Clustering with Constant Multiplicative Approximation and Near-Optimal Additive Error · AAAI 2022 |
Algorithms and data structures
clustering |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Improved Learning-augmented Algorithms for k-means and k-medians Clustering · ICLR 2023 Locally Private k-Means Clustering with Constant Multiplicative Approximation and Near-Optimal Additive Error · AAAI 2022 |
Algorithms and data structures › clustering › center-based clustering
k-median and k-means |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Improved Learning-augmented Algorithms for k-means and k-medians Clustering · ICLR 2023 |
Approximation and online algorithms
learning-augmented algorithms |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Improved Learning-augmented Algorithms for k-means and k-medians Clustering · ICLR 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization › submodular maximization
streaming submodular maximization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Streaming Submodular Maximization with Differential Privacy · ICML 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
submodular maximization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Streaming Submodular Maximization with Differential Privacy · ICML 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures › clustering
k-means clustering |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Locally Private k-Means Clustering with Constant Multiplicative Approximation and Near-Optimal Additive Error · AAAI 2022 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Differentially Private k-Means via Exponential Mechanism and Max Cover · AAAI 2021 |
Data mining › clustering
k-means clustering |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Differentially Private k-Means via Exponential Mechanism and Max Cover · AAAI 2021 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private learning
differentially private clustering |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Differentially Private k-Means via Exponential Mechanism and Max Cover · AAAI 2021 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Differentially Private k-Means via Exponential Mechanism and Max Cover · AAAI 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization › submodular maximization
maximum coverage |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Differentially Private k-Means via Exponential Mechanism and Max Cover · AAAI 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
submodular optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Differentially Private Decomposable Submodular Maximization · AAAI 2021 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
local differential privacy |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Locally Private k-Means Clustering with Constant Multiplicative Approximation and Near-Optimal Additive Error · AAAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
approximation algorithm · 2.1max cover reduction · 1.5exponential mechanism · 1.5submodular optimization · 1.3streaming algorithms · 1.3differential privacy · 1.3k-median · 0.7k-means · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Improved Learning-augmented Algorithms for k-means and k-medians Clustering
Thy Dinh Nguyen, Anamay Chaturvedi, Huy L. Nguyen 0001 |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | Streaming Submodular Maximization with Differential PrivacyabstractIn this work, we study the problem of privately maximizing a submodular function in the streaming setting. Extensive work has been done on privately maximizing submodular functions in the general case when the function depends upon the private data of individuals. However, when the size of the data stream drawn from the domain of the objective function is large or arrives very fast, one must privately optimize the objective within the constraints of the streaming setting. We establish fundamental differentially private baselines for this problem and then derive better trade-offs between privacy and utility for the special case of decomposable submodular functions. A submodular function is decomposable when it can be written as a sum of submodular functions; this structure arises naturally when each summand function models the utility of an individual and the goal is to study the total utility of the whole population as in the well-known Combinatorial Public Projects Problem. Finally, we complement our theoretical analysis with experimental corroboration. Anamay Chaturvedi, Huy L. Nguyen 0001, Thy Dinh Nguyen |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Locally Private k-Means Clustering with Constant Multiplicative Approximation and Near-Optimal Additive ErrorabstractGiven a data set of size n in d'-dimensional Euclidean space, the k-means problem asks for a set of k points (called centers) such that the sum of the l_2^2-distances between the data points and the set of centers is minimized. Previous work on this problem in the local differential privacy setting shows how to achieve multiplicative approximation factors arbitrarily close to optimal, but suffers high additive error. The additive error has also been seen to be an issue in implementations of differentially private k-means clustering algorithms in both the central and local settings. In this work, we introduce a new locally private k-means clustering algorithm that achieves near-optimal additive error whilst retaining constant multiplicative approximation factors and round complexity. Concretely, given any c>√2, our algorithm achieves O(k^(1 + O(1/(2c^2-1))) √(d' n) log d' poly log n) additive error with an O(c^2) multiplicative approximation factor. Anamay Chaturvedi |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2022 | Universal 1-Bit Compressive Sensing for Bounded Dynamic Range SignalsabstractA universal 1-bit compressive sensing (CS) scheme consists of a measurement matrix A such that for all signals x belonging to a particular class, x can be approximately recovered from sign(Ax). 1-bit CS models extreme quantization effects where only one bit of information is revealed per measurement. We focus on universal support recovery for 1-bit CS in the case of sparse signals with bounded dynamic range. Specifically, a vector x ∈ℝnis said to have sparsity k if it has at most k nonzero entries and dynamic range R if the ratio between its largest and smallest nonzero entries is at most R in magnitude. Our main result shows that if the entries of the measurement matrix Ax are i.i.d. Gaussians, then the number of measurements needs to be ${{\tilde \Omega }}\left({R{k^{3/2}}}\right)$ to recover the support of k-sparse signals with dynamic range R using 1-bit CS. This contrasts with the known lower bound of ${{\tilde \Omega }}\left({{k^2}\log n}\right)$ for the number of measurements to recover the support of arbitrary k-sparse signals. In broad scaling regimes of interest, our lower bounds match upper bounds implicit in prior works up to logarithmic factors. Sidhant Bansal, Arnab Bhattacharyya 0001, Anamay Chaturvedi, Jonathan Scarlett |
ISIT | 3 |
| 2021 | Differentially Private Decomposable Submodular MaximizationabstractWe study the problem of differentially private constrained maximization of decomposable submodular functions. A submodular function is decomposable if it takes the form of a sum of submodular functions. The special case of maximizing a monotone, decomposable submodular function under cardinality constraints is known as the Combinatorial Public Projects (CPP) problem (Papadimitriou, Schapira, and Singer 2008). Previous work by Gupta et al. (2010) gave a differentially private algorithm for the CPP problem. We extend this work by designing differentially private algorithms for both monotone and non-monotone decomposable submodular maximization under general matroid constraints, with competitive utility guarantees. We complement our theoretical bounds with experiments demonstrating improved empirical performance. Anamay Chaturvedi, Lydia Zakynthinou |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2021 | Differentially Private k-Means via Exponential Mechanism and Max CoverabstractWe introduce a new (ϵₚ, δₚ)-differentially private algorithm for the k-means clustering problem. Given a dataset in Euclidean space, the k-means clustering problem requires one to find k points in that space such that the sum of squares of Euclidean distances between each data point and its closest respective point among the k returned is minimised. Although there exist privacy-preserving methods with good theoretical guarantees to solve this problem, in practice it is seen that it is the additive error which dictates the practical performance of these methods. By reducing the problem to a sequence of instances of maximum coverage on a grid, we are able to derive a new method that achieves lower additive error than previous works. For input datasets with cardinality n and diameter Δ, our algorithm has an O(Δ² (k log² n log(1/δₚ)/ϵₚ + k √(d log(1/δₚ))/ϵₚ)) additive error whilst maintaining constant multiplicative error. We conclude with some experiments and find an improvement over previously implemented work for this problem. Huy L. Nguyen 0001, Anamay Chaturvedi, Eric Z. Xu |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2020 | Learning Gaussian Graphical Models via Multiplicative WeightsabstractGraphical model selection in Markov random fields is a fundamental problem in statistics and machine learning. Two particularly prominent models, the Ising model and Gaussian model, have largely developed in parallel using different (though often related) techniques, and several practical algorithms with rigorous sample complexity bounds have been established for each. In this paper, we adapt a recently proposed algorithm of Klivans and Meka (FOCS, 2017), based on the method of multiplicative weight updates, from the Ising model to the Gaussian model, via non-trivial modifications to both the algorithm and its analysis. The algorithm enjoys a sample complexity bound that is qualitatively similar to others in the literature, has a low runtime $O(mp^2)$ in the case of $m$ samples and $p$ nodes, and can trivially be implemented in an online manner. Anamay Chaturvedi, Jonathan Scarlett |
AISTATS | 1 |