Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Deyi Liu
dblp:259/3220
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-3321-2232ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 46% Trustworthy machine learning · 46% Image recognition and object detection · 7% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Robust and Generalizable Visual Representation Learning via Random Convolutions · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › distribution shift
robustness to distribution shift |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Robust and Generalizable Visual Representation Learning via Random Convolutions · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
robust representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Robust and Generalizable Visual Representation Learning via Random Convolutions · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
visual representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Robust and Generalizable Visual Representation Learning via Random Convolutions · ICLR 2021 |
Mathematical optimization
minimax optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Hybrid Variance-Reduced SGD Algorithms For Minimax Problems with Nonconvex-Linear Function · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Hybrid Variance-Reduced SGD Algorithms For Minimax Problems with Nonconvex-Linear Function · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
variance reduction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Hybrid Variance-Reduced SGD Algorithms For Minimax Problems with Nonconvex-Linear Function · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Robust and Generalizable Visual Representation Learning via Random Convolutions · ICLR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random convolution augmentation · 0.5stochastic gradient descent · 0.4smoothing · 0.4hybrid biased variance reduction · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | A Newton Frank-Wolfe method for constrained self-concordant minimization
Deyi Liu, Volkan Cevher, Quoc Tran-Dinh |
J. Glob. Optim. | 1 |
| 2021 | Robust and Generalizable Visual Representation Learning via Random Convolutions
Zhenlin Xu, Deyi Liu, Junlin Yang, Colin Raffel, Marc Niethammer |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2020 | Hybrid Variance-Reduced SGD Algorithms For Minimax Problems with Nonconvex-Linear FunctionabstractWe develop a novel and single-loop variance-reduced algorithm to solve a class of stochastic nonconvex-convex minimax problems involving a nonconvex-linear objective function, which has various applications in different fields such as ma- chine learning and robust optimization. This problem class has several compu- tational challenges due to its nonsmoothness, nonconvexity, nonlinearity, and non-separability of the objective functions. Our approach relies on a new combi- nation of recent ideas, including smoothing and hybrid biased variance-reduced techniques. Our algorithm and its variants can achieve $\mathcal{O}(T^{-2/3})$-convergence rate and the best-known oracle complexity under standard assumptions, where T is the iteration counter. They have several computational advantages compared to exist- ing methods such as simple to implement and less parameter tuning requirements. They can also work with both single sample or mini-batch on derivative estimators, and with constant or diminishing step-sizes. We demonstrate the benefits of our algorithms over existing methods through two numerical examples, including a nonsmooth and nonconvex-non-strongly concave minimax model. Quoc Tran-Dinh, Deyi Liu, Lam M. Nguyen |
NeurIPS | 2 |