Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Deyi Liu

dblp:259/3220 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-3321-2232ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Representation and self-supervised learning · 46% Trustworthy machine learning · 46% Image recognition and object detection · 7%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.512021
Robust and Generalizable Visual Representation Learning via Random Convolutions · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › distribution shift
robustness to distribution shift
0.512021
Robust and Generalizable Visual Representation Learning via Random Convolutions · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
robust representation learning
0.512021
Robust and Generalizable Visual Representation Learning via Random Convolutions · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
visual representation learning
0.512021
Robust and Generalizable Visual Representation Learning via Random Convolutions · ICLR 2021
Mathematical optimization
minimax optimization
0.412020
Hybrid Variance-Reduced SGD Algorithms For Minimax Problems with Nonconvex-Linear Function · NeurIPS 2020
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization
0.412020
Hybrid Variance-Reduced SGD Algorithms For Minimax Problems with Nonconvex-Linear Function · NeurIPS 2020
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
variance reduction
0.412020
Hybrid Variance-Reduced SGD Algorithms For Minimax Problems with Nonconvex-Linear Function · NeurIPS 2020
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.112021
Robust and Generalizable Visual Representation Learning via Random Convolutions · ICLR 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random convolution augmentation · 0.5stochastic gradient descent · 0.4smoothing · 0.4hybrid biased variance reduction · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 A Newton Frank-Wolfe method for constrained self-concordant minimization
Deyi Liu, Volkan Cevher, Quoc Tran-Dinh
J. Glob. Optim.1
2021 Robust and Generalizable Visual Representation Learning via Random Convolutions
Zhenlin Xu, Deyi Liu, Junlin Yang, Colin Raffel, Marc Niethammer
ICLR2
2020 Hybrid Variance-Reduced SGD Algorithms For Minimax Problems with Nonconvex-Linear Function
abstract
We develop a novel and single-loop variance-reduced algorithm to solve a class of stochastic nonconvex-convex minimax problems involving a nonconvex-linear objective function, which has various applications in different fields such as ma- chine learning and robust optimization. This problem class has several compu- tational challenges due to its nonsmoothness, nonconvexity, nonlinearity, and non-separability of the objective functions. Our approach relies on a new combi- nation of recent ideas, including smoothing and hybrid biased variance-reduced techniques. Our algorithm and its variants can achieve $\mathcal{O}(T^{-2/3})$-convergence rate and the best-known oracle complexity under standard assumptions, where T is the iteration counter. They have several computational advantages compared to exist- ing methods such as simple to implement and less parameter tuning requirements. They can also work with both single sample or mini-batch on derivative estimators, and with constant or diminishing step-sizes. We demonstrate the benefits of our algorithms over existing methods through two numerical examples, including a nonsmooth and nonconvex-non-strongly concave minimax model.
Quoc Tran-Dinh, Deyi Liu, Lam M. Nguyen
NeurIPS2