Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Simran Tiwari

dblp:259/5440 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 87% Representation and self-supervised learning · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal fusion
0.712023
Towards Fast Adaptation of Pretrained Contrastive Models for Multi-channel Video-Language Retrieval · CVPR 2023
Computer vision › Vision and language
video-text retrieval
0.712023
Towards Fast Adaptation of Pretrained Contrastive Models for Multi-channel Video-Language Retrieval · CVPR 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.212023
Towards Fast Adaptation of Pretrained Contrastive Models for Multi-channel Video-Language Retrieval · CVPR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multimodal transformer · 0.7contrastive pre-training · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Towards Fast Adaptation of Pretrained Contrastive Models for Multi-channel Video-Language Retrieval
abstract
Multi-channel video-language retrieval require models to understand information from different channels (e.g. video+question, video+speech) to correctly link a video with a textual response or query. Fortunately, contrastive multimodal models are shown to be highly effective at aligning entities in images/videos and text, e.g., CLIP [20]; text contrastive models are extensively studied recently for their strong ability of producing discriminative sentence embeddings, e.g., SimCSE [5]. However, there is not a clear way to quickly adapt these two lines to multi-channel video-language retrieval with limited data and resources. In this paper, we identify a principled model design space with two axes: how to represent videos and how to fuse video and text information. Based on categorization of recent methods, we investigate the options of representing videos using continuous feature vectors or discrete text tokens; for the fusion method, we explore the use of a multimodal transformer or a pretrained contrastive text model. We extensively evaluate the four combinations on five video-language datasets. We surprisingly find that discrete text tokens coupled with a pretrained contrastive text model yields the best performance, which can even outperform state-of-the-art on the iVQA and How2QA datasets without additional training on millions of video-text data. Further analysis shows that this is because representing videos as text tokens captures the key visual information and text tokens are naturally aligned with text models that are strong retrievers after the contrastive pretraining process. All the empirical analysis establishes a solid foundation for future research on affordable and upgradable multimodal intelligence.
Xudong Lin 0003, Simran Tiwari, Shiyuan Huang 0001, Manling Li, Zheng Shou 0001, Heng Ji 0001, Shih-Fu Chang
CVPR2