EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shouxing Xiang
dblp:259/5592
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Visualization and visual analytics · 71% Rendering · 29% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Image recognition and object detection · 50% Vision and language · 50% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rendering
sampling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Evaluation of Sampling Methods for Scatterplots · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2021 |
Visualization and visual analytics
scatterplot |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Evaluation of Sampling Methods for Scatterplots · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2021 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › cross-modal supervision
caption-based supervision |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Towards Better Caption Supervision for Object Detection · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2022 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
weakly supervised object detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Towards Better Caption Supervision for Object Detection · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2022 |
Visualization and visual analytics › visualization evaluation
user study |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Evaluation of Sampling Methods for Scatterplots · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
node-link-based set visualization · 1.1multi-type relational co-clustering · 1.1random sampling · 0.5outlier biased density based sampling · 0.5blue noise sampling · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Towards Better Caption Supervision for Object DetectionabstractAs training high-performance object detectors requires expensive bounding box annotations, recent methods resort to free-available image captions. However, detectors trained on caption supervision perform poorly because captions are usually noisy and cannot provide precise location information. To tackle this issue, we present a visual analysis method, which tightly integrates caption supervision with object detection to mutually enhance each other. In particular, object labels are first extracted from captions, which are utilized to train the detectors. Then, the objects detected from images are fed into caption supervision for further improvement. To effectively loop users into the object detection process, a node-link-based set visualization supported by a multi-type relational co-clustering algorithm is developed to explain the relationships between the extracted labels and the images with detected objects. The co-clustering algorithm clusters labels and images simultaneously by utilizing both their representations and their relationships. Quantitative evaluations and a case study are conducted to demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of the developed method in improving the performance of object detectors. Changjian Chen, Jing Wu 0004, Shouxing Xiang, Song-Hai Zhang, Qifeng Tang, Shixia Liu |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 4 |
| 2021 | Evaluation of Sampling Methods for ScatterplotsabstractGiven a scatterplot with tens of thousands of points or even more, a natural question is which sampling method should be used to create a small but "good" scatterplot for a better abstraction. We present the results of a user study that investigates the influence of different sampling strategies on multi-class scatterplots. The main goal of this study is to understand the capability of sampling methods in preserving the density, outliers, and overall shape of a scatterplot. To this end, we comprehensively review the literature and select seven typical sampling strategies as well as eight representative datasets. We then design four experiments to understand the performance of different strategies in maintaining: 1) region density; 2) class density; 3) outliers; and 4) overall shape in the sampling results. The results show that: 1) random sampling is preferred for preserving region density; 2) blue noise sampling and random sampling have comparable performance with the three multi-class sampling strategies in preserving class density; 3) outlier biased density based sampling, recursive subdivision based sampling, and blue noise sampling perform the best in keeping outliers; and 4) blue noise sampling outperforms the others in maintaining the overall shape of a scatterplot. Jun Yuan 0003, Shouxing Xiang, Jiazhi Xia, Lingyun Yu 0001, Shixia Liu |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 2 |