Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Huihui Qin

dblp:259/6406 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-3597-4855ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 56% Computational science and engineering · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference
gene regulatory network inference
0.412020
Can ODE gene regulatory models neglect time lag or measurement scaling? · Bioinform. 2020
Computational science and engineering › differential equations
ordinary differential equations
0.412020
Can ODE gene regulatory models neglect time lag or measurement scaling? · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
time course gene expression analysis
0.112020
Can ODE gene regulatory models neglect time lag or measurement scaling? · Bioinform. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.4linear regression · 0.4lagged ODE model · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Can ODE gene regulatory models neglect time lag or measurement scaling?
abstract
MOTIVATION: Many ordinary differential equation (ODE) models have been introduced to replace linear regression models for inferring gene regulatory relationships from time-course gene expression data. But, since the observed data are usually not direct measurements of the gene products or there is an unknown time lag in gene regulation, it is problematic to directly apply traditional ODE models or linear regression models. RESULTS: We introduce a lagged ODE model to infer lagged gene regulatory relationships from time-course measurements, which are modeled as linear transformation of the gene products. A time-course microarray dataset from a yeast cell-cycle study is used for simulation assessment of the methods and real data analysis. The results show that our method, by considering both time lag and measurement scaling, performs much better than other linear and ODE models. It indicates the necessity of explicitly modeling the time lag and measurement scaling in ODE gene regulatory models. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: R code is available at https://www.sta.cuhk.edu.hk/xfan/share/lagODE.zip.
Jie Hu 0035, Huihui Qin, Xiaodan Fan
Bioinform.2
2019 Search for K: Assessing Five Topic-Modeling Approaches to 120, 000 Canadian Articles
abstract
Topic modeling has been an important field in natural language processing (NLP) and recently witnessed great methodological advances. Yet, the development of topic modeling is still, if not increasingly, challenged by two critical issues. First, despite intense efforts toward nonparametric/post-training methods, the search for the optimal number of topics K remains a fundamental question in topic modeling and warrants input from domain experts. Second, with the development of more sophisticated models, topic modeling is now ironically been treated as a black box and it becomes increasingly difficult to tell how research findings are informed by data, model specifications, or inference algorithms. Based on about 120,000 newspaper articles retrieved from three major Canadian newspapers (Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, and National Post) since 1977, we employ five methods with different model specifications and inference algorithms (Latent Semantic Analysis, Latent Dirichlet Allocation, Principal Component Analysis, Factor Analysis, Nonnegative Matrix Factorization) to identify discussion topics. The optimal topics are then assessed using three measures: coherence statistics, held-out likelihood (loss), and graph-based dimensionality selection. Mixed findings from this research complement advances in topic modeling and provide insights into the choice of optimal topics in social science research.
Qiang Fu 0022, Yufan Zhuang, Jiaxin Gu, Yushu Zhu, Huihui Qin, Xin Guo 0003
IEEE BigData5