Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Huihui Qin
dblp:259/6406
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-3597-4855ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 56% Computational science and engineering · 44% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference
gene regulatory network inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Can ODE gene regulatory models neglect time lag or measurement scaling? · Bioinform. 2020 |
Computational science and engineering › differential equations
ordinary differential equations |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Can ODE gene regulatory models neglect time lag or measurement scaling? · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
time course gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Can ODE gene regulatory models neglect time lag or measurement scaling? · Bioinform. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.4linear regression · 0.4lagged ODE model · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Can ODE gene regulatory models neglect time lag or measurement scaling?abstractMOTIVATION: Many ordinary differential equation (ODE) models have been introduced to replace linear regression models for inferring gene regulatory relationships from time-course gene expression data. But, since the observed data are usually not direct measurements of the gene products or there is an unknown time lag in gene regulation, it is problematic to directly apply traditional ODE models or linear regression models. RESULTS: We introduce a lagged ODE model to infer lagged gene regulatory relationships from time-course measurements, which are modeled as linear transformation of the gene products. A time-course microarray dataset from a yeast cell-cycle study is used for simulation assessment of the methods and real data analysis. The results show that our method, by considering both time lag and measurement scaling, performs much better than other linear and ODE models. It indicates the necessity of explicitly modeling the time lag and measurement scaling in ODE gene regulatory models. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: R code is available at https://www.sta.cuhk.edu.hk/xfan/share/lagODE.zip. Jie Hu 0035, Huihui Qin, Xiaodan Fan |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2019 | Search for K: Assessing Five Topic-Modeling Approaches to 120, 000 Canadian ArticlesabstractTopic modeling has been an important field in natural language processing (NLP) and recently witnessed great methodological advances. Yet, the development of topic modeling is still, if not increasingly, challenged by two critical issues. First, despite intense efforts toward nonparametric/post-training methods, the search for the optimal number of topics K remains a fundamental question in topic modeling and warrants input from domain experts. Second, with the development of more sophisticated models, topic modeling is now ironically been treated as a black box and it becomes increasingly difficult to tell how research findings are informed by data, model specifications, or inference algorithms. Based on about 120,000 newspaper articles retrieved from three major Canadian newspapers (Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, and National Post) since 1977, we employ five methods with different model specifications and inference algorithms (Latent Semantic Analysis, Latent Dirichlet Allocation, Principal Component Analysis, Factor Analysis, Nonnegative Matrix Factorization) to identify discussion topics. The optimal topics are then assessed using three measures: coherence statistics, held-out likelihood (loss), and graph-based dimensionality selection. Mixed findings from this research complement advances in topic modeling and provide insights into the choice of optimal topics in social science research. Qiang Fu 0022, Yufan Zhuang, Jiaxin Gu, Yushu Zhu, Huihui Qin, Xin Guo 0003 |
IEEE BigData | 5 |