Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
M. Anthony Aiello
dblp:26/1759
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program verification
deductive verification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Practical Application of SPARK to OpenUxAS · FM 2019 |
Embedded and real-time systems › critical systems
safety-critical software |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Practical Application of SPARK to OpenUxAS · FM 2019 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Practical Application of SPARK to OpenUxAS
M. Anthony Aiello, Claire Dross, Patrick Rogers, Laura R. Humphrey, James Hamil |
FM | 1 |
| 2005 | Assured Reconfiguration of Fail-Stop SystemsabstractHardware dependability improvements have led to a situation in which it is sometimes unnecessary to employ extensive hardware replication to mask hardware faults. Expanding upon our previous work on assured reconfiguration for single processes and building upon the fail-stop model of processor behavior, we define a framework that provides assured reconfiguration for concurrent software. This framework can provide high dependability with lower space, power, and weight requirements than systems that replicate hardware to mask all anticipated faults. We base our assurance argument on a proof structure that extends the proofs for the single-application case and includes the fail-stop model of processor behavior. To assess the feasibility of instantiating our framework, we have implemented a hypothetical avionics system that is representative of what might be found on an unmanned aerial vehicle. Elisabeth A. Strunk, John C. Knight, M. Anthony Aiello |
DSN | 3 |