Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Karl-Heinz John

dblp:26/3174 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 68% Parallel and multicore computing · 16% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 16%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization
0.011983
Experiences with Performance Measurement and Modeling of a Processor Array · IEEE Trans. Computers 1983
Parallel and multicore computing
array processor
0.011983
Experiences with Performance Measurement and Modeling of a Processor Array · IEEE Trans. Computers 1983
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.011983
Experiences with Performance Measurement and Modeling of a Processor Array · IEEE Trans. Computers 1983
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
network topology
0.011983
Experiences with Performance Measurement and Modeling of a Processor Array · IEEE Trans. Computers 1983

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

performance modeling · 0.0performance measurement · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Applicability of Security Standards for Operational Technology by SMEs and Large Enterprises
abstract
Establishing adequate cybersecurity for their operational technology (OT) is an existential challenge for manufacturing enterprises. Domain-specific security standards should provide essential support in this challenge. However, they cannot be implemented equally for enterprises of all sizes.We investigate to what extent domain-specific security standards for operational technology are applicable by small and medium-sized as well as large manufacturing enterprises, and how their individual need for action can be identified and addressed. We support our investigation with the results of two independent surveys among manufacturers about their needs for cybersecurity support.In the course of this investigation, we learned that most domain-specific security standards are well applicable to large enterprises. In contrast, small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) seek the support of security experts, who, for their part, are often struggling with a lack of experience in operational technology. To facilitate this cooperation, we provide an introduction for OT-and cybersecurity-experts to the respective basic concepts of their collaborators.
Patrick Wagner 0004, Gerhard Hansch, Christoph Konrad, Karl-Heinz John, Jochen Bauer, Jörg Franke
ETFA4
1983 Experiences with Performance Measurement and Modeling of a Processor Array
abstract
The evolution of technology provides the opportunity of forming large processor ensembles working closely together. When decomposing application programs and assigning subtasks to different processors we expect not only high throughput, but also the fastest possible execution of each individual demand. The level of performance in these areas is strongly influenced by the hardware interconnection structure and by the communication software.
Hansjörg Fromm, Uwe Hercksen, Ulrich Herzog, Karl-Heinz John, Rainer Klar, Wolfgang Kleinöder
IEEE Trans. Computers4