Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Woodrow E. Robbins

dblp:26/332 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Coding theory · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Integrated circuit design · 62% Electronic design automation · 38%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Learning and educational technologies · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
block codes
0.011978
Optimal Encodings of Linear Block Codes for Unequal Error Protection · Inf. Control. 1978
Coding theory › source coding
optimal encoding
0.011978
Optimal Encodings of Linear Block Codes for Unequal Error Protection · Inf. Control. 1978
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
unequal error protection
0.011978
Optimal Encodings of Linear Block Codes for Unequal Error Protection · Inf. Control. 1978
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design
logic design
0.011974
On Two-Level Exclusive-or Majority Networks · IEEE Trans. Computers 1974
Coding theory
error-correcting codes
0.011972
One-step weighted-majority decoding (Corresp.) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1972
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
linear code
0.011972
One-step weighted-majority decoding (Corresp.) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1972
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis
boolean function realization
0.011974
On Two-Level Exclusive-or Majority Networks · IEEE Trans. Computers 1974
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis
0.011974
On Two-Level Exclusive-or Majority Networks · IEEE Trans. Computers 1974

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weighted majority decoding · 0.0weight vector minimization · 0.0restricted-affine-group equivalence · 0.0parity check · 0.0natural language processing · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1993 Simple and efficient 2D and 3D span clipping algorithms
Victor J. Duvanenko, Ronald S. Gyurcsik, Woodrow E. Robbins
Comput. Graph.3
1978 Optimal Encodings of Linear Block Codes for Unequal Error Protection
Larry A. Dunning, Woodrow E. Robbins
Inf. Control.2
1975 Using Computers in a Natural Language Mode for Elementary Education
Alan L. Tharp, Woodrow E. Robbins
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud.2
1974 On Two-Level Exclusive-or Majority Networks
abstract
It is shown that not all Boolean functions can be realized by a two-level EXCLUSIVE-OR majority network. However, if repeats at the first level are allowed, then it is shown that such a network is universal. A minimal weight vector with respect to this latter network is defined. By using the restricted-affine-group (RAG) equivalence of Boolean functions, it is shown that if two functions are in the same RAG class, then they are realized by the same minimal weight vector to within permutations and/or sign changes.
Woodrow E. Robbins, Luther D. Rudolph
IEEE Trans. Computers1
1972 One-step weighted-majority decoding (Corresp.)
abstract
It is shown that any decoding function for a linear binary code can be realized as a weighted majority of nonorthogonal parity checks. An example is given of a four-error-correcting code that is neither L-step orthogonalizable nor one-step majority decodable using non-orthogonal parity checks and yet is one-step weighted-majority decodable using only ten nonorthogonal parity checks.
Luther D. Rudolph, Woodrow E. Robbins
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2