Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefan Rüping 0001

dblp:26/4352-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
19ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-3752-5789ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 8 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 65% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 17% Learning paradigms · 17%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
pattern mining
0.222012
An enhanced relevance criterion for more concise supervised pattern discovery · KDD 2012
Ranking interesting subgroups · ICML 2009
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification
0.112010
SVM Classifier Estimation from Group Probabilities · ICML 2010
Data mining › pattern mining › association rule mining
interestingness measures
0.112009
Ranking interesting subgroups · ICML 2009
Data mining › pattern mining
subgroup discovery
0.112009
Ranking interesting subgroups · ICML 2009
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
incremental learning
0.012001
Incremental Learning with Support Vector Machines · ICDM 2001
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
support vector machine
0.012001
Incremental Learning with Support Vector Machines · ICDM 2001
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
capacity control
0.012001
Incremental Learning with Support Vector Machines · ICDM 2001

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

relevance criterion · 0.1support vector machine · 0.1ranking support vector machines · 0.1incremental learning · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Graph Pattern Mining for Anomalous Business Partnerships
Moritz Luecke, Héctor Allende-Cid, Stefan Rüping 0001
ICPRAM3
2025 A systematic review of long document summarization methods: Evaluation metrics and approaches
Bady Gana, Héctor Allende-Cid, Stefan Rüping 0001, Marcelo Becerra-Rozas, Juan Zamora
Neurocomputing3
2014 The Technologically Integrated Oncosimulator: Combining Multiscale Cancer Modeling With Information Technology in the In Silico Oncology Context
abstract
This paper outlines the major components and function of the technologically integrated oncosimulator developed primarily within the Advancing Clinico Genomic Trials on Cancer (ACGT) project. The Oncosimulator is defined as an information technology system simulating in vivo tumor response to therapeutic modalities within the clinical trial context. Chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting, according to two real clinical trials concerning nephroblastoma and breast cancer, has been considered. The spatiotemporal simulation module embedded in the Oncosimulator is based on the multiscale, predominantly top-down, discrete entity-discrete event cancer simulation technique developed by the In Silico Oncology Group, National Technical University of Athens. The technology modules include multiscale data handling, image processing, invocation of code execution via a spreadsheet-inspired environment portal, execution of the code on the grid, and the visualization of the predictions. A refining scenario for the eventual coupling of the oncosimulator with immunological models is also presented. Parameter values have been adapted to multiscale clinical trial data in a consistent way, thus supporting the predictive potential of the oncosimulator. Indicative results demonstrating various aspects of the clinical adaptation and validation process are presented. Completion of these processes is expected to pave the way for the clinical translation of the system.
Georgios S. Stamatakos, Dimitra D. Dionysiou, Aran Lunzer, Robert G. Belleman, Eleni A. Kolokotroni, Eleni Ch. Georgiadi, Marius Erdt, Juliusz Pukacki, Stefan Rüping 0001, Stavroula G. Giatili, Alberto d'Onofrio, Stelios Sfakianakis, Kostas Marias, Christine Desmedt, Manolis Tsiknakis, Norbert Graf 0001
IEEE J. Biomed. Health Informatics9
2012 Towards a Meaningful Analysis of Big Data - Enhancing Data Mining Techniques through a Collaborative Decision Making Environment
Nikos I. Karacapilidis, Stefan Rüping 0001, Georgia Tsiliki, Manolis Tzagarakis
DATA2
2012 Data Mining Based Collaborative Analysis of Microarray Data
abstract
Biomedical research has recently seen a vast growth in publicly and instantly available information, which are often complementary or overlapping. As the available resources become more specialized, there is a growing need for multidisciplinary collaborations between biomedical researchers to address complex research questions. We present an application of a data-mining algorithm to gene-expression data in a collaborative decision-making support environment, as a typical example of how multidisciplinary researchers can collaborate in analyzing and biologically interpreting gene-expression micro array data. Through the proposed approach, researchers can easily decide about which data repositories should be considered, analyze the algorithmic results, discuss the weaknesses of the patterns identified, and set up new iterations of the data mining algorithm by defining other descriptive attributes or integrating other relevant data.
Georgia Tsiliki, Sophia Kossida, Natalja Friesen, Stefan Rüping 0001, Manolis Tzagarakis, Nikos I. Karacapilidis
ICTAI4
2012 An enhanced relevance criterion for more concise supervised pattern discovery
abstract
Supervised local pattern discovery aims to find subsets of a database with a high statistical unusualness in the distribution of a target attribute. Local pattern discovery is often used to generate a human-understandable representation of the most interesting dependencies in a data set. Hence, the more crisp and concise the output is, the better. Unfortunately, standard algorithm often produce very large and redundant outputs.
Henrik Grosskreutz, Daniel Paurat, Stefan Rüping 0001
KDD3
2010 SVM Classifier Estimation from Group Probabilities
Stefan Rüping 0001
ICML1
2009 Ranking interesting subgroups
abstract
Subgroup discovery is the task of identifying the top k patterns in a database with most significant deviation in the distribution of a target attribute Y. Subgroup discovery is a popular approach for identifying interesting patterns in data, because it combines statistical significance with an understandable representation of patterns as a logical formula. However, it is often a problem that some subgroups, even if they are statistically highly significant, are not interesting to the user. We present an approach based on the work on ranking Support Vector Machines that ranks subgroups with respect to the user's concept of interestingness, and finds more interesting subgroups. This approach can significantly increase the quality of the subgroups.
Stefan Rüping 0001
ICML1
2009 On Subgroup Discovery in Numerical Domains
Henrik Grosskreutz, Stefan Rüping 0001
ECML/PKDD (1)2
2009 On subgroup discovery in numerical domains
Henrik Grosskreutz, Stefan Rüping 0001
Data Min. Knowl. Discov.2
2009 GridR: An R-based tool for scientific data analysis in grid environments
Dennis Wegener, Thierry Sengstag, Stelios Sfakianakis, Stefan Rüping 0001, Anthony Assi
Future Gener. Comput. Syst.4
2008 Supporting Parallel R Code in Clinical Trials: A Grid-Based Approach
abstract
In this paper, we describe an extension to the ACGT GridR environment which allows the parallelization of loops in R scripts in view of their distributed execution on a computational grid. The ACGT GridR service is extended by a component that uses a set of preprocessor-like directives to organize and distribute calculations. The use of parallelization directives as special R comments provides users with the potential to accelerate lengthy calculations with changes to preexisting code. The GridR service and its extension are developed as components of the ACGT platform, one aim of which is to facilitate the data mining of clinical trials involving large datasets. In ACGT, GridR scripts are executed in the framework of a specifically developed workflow environment, which is also briefly outlined in the present article.
Dennis Wegener, Thierry Sengstag, Stelios Sfakianakis, Stefan Rüping 0001
ISPA4
2008 Tight Optimistic Estimates for Fast Subgroup Discovery
Henrik Grosskreutz, Stefan Rüping 0001, Stefan Wrobel
ECML/PKDD (1)2
2007 GridR: An R-Based Grid-Enabled Tool for Data Analysis in ACGT Clinico-Genomics Trials
abstract
In this paper, we describe an analysis tool based on the statistical environment R, GridR, which allows using the collection of methodologies available as R packages in a grid environment. The aim of GridR, which was initiated in the context of the EU project Advancing Clinico-Genomics Trials on Cancer (ACGT), is to provide a powerful framework for the analysis of clinico-genomic trials involving large amount of data (e.g. microarray-based clinical trials). As a proof of concept, an example of microarray-based analysis taken from the literature was reproduced using GridR. As GridR will ultimately be made available to the ACGT community as a web service, we are sketching the ACGT project and its architecture in the present article as well.
Dennis Wegener, Thierry Sengstag, Stelios Sfakianakis, Stefan Rüping 0001, Anthony Assi
eScience4
2007 Knowledge Discovery Scientific Workflows in Clinico-Genomics
abstract
With the completion of the human genome and the entrance into the post-genomic era, translational research rises as a major need. In this paper, we present a knowledge discovery workflow (KDw) and its utilization in the context of clinico-genomic trials. KDw aims towards the discovery of 'evidential' correlations between patients' genomic and clinical profiles. Application of KDw on a real-world clinico-genomic (breast cancer) study demonstrates the reliability, efficacy, and efficiency of the approach.
George Potamias, Lefteris Koumakis, Alexandros Kanterakis, Stelios Sfakianakis, Anastasia Analyti, Vassilis Moustakis, Dimitris Kafetzopoulos, Stefan Rüping 0001, Manolis Tsiknakis
ICTAI (1)8
2006 Robust Probabilistic Calibration
Stefan Rüping 0001
ECML1
2003 Support vector machines and learning about time
abstract
The analysis of temporal data is an important issue in current research, because most real-world data either explicitly or implicitly contains some information about time. The key to successfully solving temporal learning tasks is to analyze the assumptions and prior knowledge that can be made about the temporal process of the learning problem and find a representation of the data and a learning algorithm that makes effective use of this knowledge. The paper presents a concise overview of the application of support vector machines to different temporal learning tasks and the corresponding temporal representations.
Stefan Rüping 0001, Katharina Morik
ICASSP (4)1
2002 A Multistrategy Approach to the Classification of Phases in Business Cycles
Katharina Morik, Stefan Rüping 0001
ECML2
2001 Incremental Learning with Support Vector Machines
abstract
Support vector machines (SVMs) have become a popular tool for machine learning with large amounts of high dimensional data. In this paper an approach for incremental learning with support vector machines is presented, that improves the existing approach of Syed et al. (1999). An insight into the interpretability of support vectors is also given.
Stefan Rüping 0001
ICDM1