Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Keith Bertrand

dblp:26/4645 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene expression classification
0.112006
A method for predicting disease subtypes in presence of misclassification among training samples using gene expression: application to human breast cancer · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
breast cancer
0.012006
A method for predicting disease subtypes in presence of misclassification among training samples using gene expression: application to human breast cancer · Bioinform. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

supervised learning · 0.1statistical model for mislabeling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 A method for predicting disease subtypes in presence of misclassification among training samples using gene expression: application to human breast cancer
abstract
MOTIVATION: An accurate diagnostic and prediction will not be achieved unless the disease subtype status for every training sample used in the supervised learning step is accurately known. Such an assumption requires the existence of a perfect tool for disease diagnostic and classification, which is seldom available in the majority of the cases. Thus, the supervised learning step has to be conducted with a statistical model that contemplates and handles potential mislabeling in the input data. RESULTS: A procedure for handling potential mislabeling among training samples in the prediction of disease subtypes using gene expression data was proposed. A real data-based simulation study about the estrogen receptor status (ER+/ER-) of breast cancer patients was conducted. The results demonstrated that when 1-4 training samples (N = 30) were artificially mislabeled, the proposed method was able not only in correcting the ER status of mislabeled training samples but also more importantly in predicting the ER status of validation samples as well as using 'true' training data.
Romdhane Rekaya, Keith Bertrand
Bioinform.3