Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hong-Bin Wu
dblp:26/5375
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Coding theory · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
convolutional codes |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | A maximum-likelihood soft-decision sequential decoding algorithm for binary convolutional codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2002 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › soft-decision decoding
maximum-likelihood soft-decision decoding |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | A maximum-likelihood soft-decision sequential decoding algorithm for binary convolutional codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2002 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
sequential decoding |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | A maximum-likelihood soft-decision sequential decoding algorithm for binary convolutional codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2002 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › trellis decoding
viterbi algorithm |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | A maximum-likelihood soft-decision sequential decoding algorithm for binary convolutional codes · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
trellis-based decoding · 0.0stack algorithm · 0.0fano metric · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | A maximum-likelihood soft-decision sequential decoding algorithm for binary convolutional codesabstractWe present a trellis-based maximum-likelihood soft-decision sequential decoding algorithm (MLSDA) for binary convolutional codes. Simulation results show that, for (2, 1, 6) and (2, 1, 16) codes antipodally transmitted over the AWGN channel, the average computational effort required by the algorithm is several orders of magnitude less than that of the Viterbi algorithm. Also shown via simulations upon the same system models is that, under moderate SNR, the algorithm is about four times faster than the conventional sequential decoding algorithm (i.e., stack algorithm with Fano metric) having comparable bit-error probability. Yunghsiang Sam Han, Po-Ning Chen, Hong-Bin Wu |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 3 |