EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aldo Eisma
dblp:26/5550
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 67% Software maintenance and evolution · 33% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution › software reengineering
application extraction |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Practical extraction techniques for Java · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2002 |
Compilers and program optimization
dead code elimination |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Practical extraction techniques for Java · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2002 |
Compilers and program optimization
program specialization |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Practical extraction techniques for Java · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
modular specification · 0.1inlining · 0.1class hierarchy transformation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | Practical extraction techniques for JavaabstractReducing application size is important for software that is distributed via the internet, in order to keep download times manageable, and in the domain of embedded systems, where applications are often stored in (Read-Only or Flash) memory. This paper explores extraction techniques such as the removal of unreachable methods and redundant fields, inlining of method calls, and transformation of the class hierarchy for reducing application size. We implemented a number of extraction techniques in Jax , an application extractor for Java, and evaluated their effectiveness on a set of large Java applications. We found that, on average, the class file archives for these benchmarks were reduced to 37.5% of their original size. Modeling dynamic language features such as reflection, and extracting software distributions other than complete applications requires additional user input. We present a uniform approach for supplying this input that relies on MEL, a modular specification language. We also discuss a number of issues and challenges associated with the extraction of embedded systems applications. Frank Tip, Peter F. Sweeney, Chris Laffra, Aldo Eisma, David Streeter |
ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. | 4 |