Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Aldo Eisma

dblp:26/5550 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2002
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 67% Software maintenance and evolution · 33%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution › software reengineering
application extraction
0.012002
Practical extraction techniques for Java · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2002
Compilers and program optimization
dead code elimination
0.012002
Practical extraction techniques for Java · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2002
Compilers and program optimization
program specialization
0.012002
Practical extraction techniques for Java · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

modular specification · 0.1inlining · 0.1class hierarchy transformation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2002 Practical extraction techniques for Java
abstract
Reducing application size is important for software that is distributed via the internet, in order to keep download times manageable, and in the domain of embedded systems, where applications are often stored in (Read-Only or Flash) memory. This paper explores extraction techniques such as the removal of unreachable methods and redundant fields, inlining of method calls, and transformation of the class hierarchy for reducing application size. We implemented a number of extraction techniques in Jax , an application extractor for Java, and evaluated their effectiveness on a set of large Java applications. We found that, on average, the class file archives for these benchmarks were reduced to 37.5% of their original size. Modeling dynamic language features such as reflection, and extracting software distributions other than complete applications requires additional user input. We present a uniform approach for supplying this input that relies on MEL, a modular specification language. We also discuss a number of issues and challenges associated with the extraction of embedded systems applications.
Frank Tip, Peter F. Sweeney, Chris Laffra, Aldo Eisma, David Streeter
ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst.4