Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Akira Tanigami
dblp:26/5842
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomedical text mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Automated extraction of information on protein-protein interactions from the biological literature · Bioinform. 2001 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biomedical text mining
information extraction |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Automated extraction of information on protein-protein interactions from the biological literature · Bioinform. 2001 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biomedical text mining › relation extraction
protein-protein interaction extraction |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Automated extraction of information on protein-protein interactions from the biological literature · Bioinform. 2001 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biomedical text mining
relation extraction |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Automated extraction of information on protein-protein interactions from the biological literature · Bioinform. 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
surface clue patterns · 0.0protein name dictionary · 0.0part-of-speech rules · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | Automated extraction of information on protein-protein interactions from the biological literatureabstractAbstract Motivation: To understand biological process, we must clarify how proteins interact with each other. However, since information about protein–protein interactions still exists primarily in the scientific literature, it is not accessible in a computer-readable format. Efficient processing of large amounts of interactions therefore needs an intelligent information extraction method. Our aim is to develop an efficient method for extracting information on protein–protein interaction from scientific literature. Results: We present a method for extracting information on protein–protein interactions from the scientific literature. This method, which employs only a protein name dictionary, surface clues on word patterns and simple part-of-speech rules, achieved high recall and precision rates for yeast (recall \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(=\) \end{document}86.8% and precision \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(=\) \end{document}94.3%) and Escherichia coli (recall \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(=\) \end{document}82.5% and precision \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \(=\) \end{document}93.5%). The result of extraction suggests that our method should be applicable to any species for which a protein name dictionary is constructed. Availability: The program is available on request from the authors. Contact: [email protected] * To whom correspondence should be addressed. Toshihide Ono, Haretsugu Hishigaki, Akira Tanigami, Toshihisa Takagi |
Bioinform. | 3 |