Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

David Melgar

dblp:26/5929 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 33% Health and well-being technologies · 33% Usability and user experience research · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Usability and user experience research › evaluation methodology
interface evaluation		 0.012004
Human-machine Interface Evaluation in a Computer Assisted Surgical System · ICRA 2004
Health and well-being technologies
surgical robotics		 0.012004
Human-machine Interface Evaluation in a Computer Assisted Surgical System · ICRA 2004
Human-robot interaction
teleoperation		 0.012004
Human-machine Interface Evaluation in a Computer Assisted Surgical System · ICRA 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rating scale · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Human-machine Interface Evaluation in a Computer Assisted Surgical System
abstract
This work presents an approach to the evaluation of two interfaces for the control of a robotic surgical assistant. Each interface is associated to a different mode of controlling the system: by the surgeon (voice commands) or by the assistant (tactile interface). This two modes are allowed by the design of the manipulator, developed to occupy a small volume in the operating room. To evaluate the interfaces, a rating scale for teleoperated systems is proposed.
Juan Jesús Fernández Lozano, Jesús M. Gómez de Gabriel, Victor F. Muñoz, Isabel García-Morales, David Melgar, Carlos Vara-Thorbeck, Alfonso García-Cerezo
 ICRA5