Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Madhusudan Hosaagrahara
dblp:26/6056
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Wireless networking · 30% Routing and switching · 30% Network optimization and economics · 24% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Wireless networking
fair scheduling |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Max-Min Fair Scheduling in Input-Queued Switches · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2008 |
Routing and switching
input-queued switch |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Max-Min Fair Scheduling in Input-Queued Switches · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2008 |
Network optimization and economics › fairness
max-min fairness |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Max-Min Fair Scheduling in Input-Queued Switches · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2008 |
Wireless networking › fair scheduling
max-min fair scheduling |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Max-Min Fair Scheduling in Input-Queued Switches · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2008 |
Internet architecture and protocols
quality of service |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Max-Min Fair Scheduling in Input-Queued Switches · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2008 |
Routing and switching
scheduling algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Max-Min Fair Scheduling in Input-Queued Switches · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2008 |
Network optimization and economics › resource allocation
bandwidth allocation |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Max-Min Fair Scheduling in Input-Queued Switches · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2008 |
Network optimization and economics › fairness
max-min fair rate allocation |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Max-Min Fair Scheduling in Input-Queued Switches · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.1distributed algorithm · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Max-Min Fair Scheduling in Input-Queued SwitchesabstractFairness in traffic management can improve the isolation between traffic streams, offer a more predictable performance, eliminate transient bottlenecks, mitigate the effect of certain kinds of denial-of-service attacks, and serve as a critical component of a quality-of-service strategy to achieve certain guaranteed services such as delay bounds and minimum bandwidths. In this paper, we choose a popular notion of fairness called max-min fairness and provide a rigorous definition in the context of input-queued switches. We show that being fair at the output ports alone or at the input ports alone or even at both input and output ports does not actually achieve an overall max-min fair allocation of bandwidth in a switch. Instead, we propose a new algorithm that can be readily implemented in a distributed fashion at the input and output ports to determine the exact max-min fair rate allocations for the flows through the switch. In addition to proving the correctness of the algorithm, we propose a practical scheduling strategy based on our algorithm. We present simulation results, using both real traffic traces and synthetic traffic, to evaluate the fairness of a variety of popular scheduling algorithms for input-queued switches. The results show that our scheduling strategy achieves better fairness than other known algorithms for input-queued switches and, in addition, achieves throughput performance very close to that of the best schedulers. Madhusudan Hosaagrahara, Harish Sethu |
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. | 1 |
| 2005 | A new low-delay matching algorithm for input-queued switchesabstractThis paper presents a randomized algorithm, called degree-sequenced matching (DSM), for scheduling packets in an input-queued switch. Previously known high-throughput, randomized algorithms implicitly prioritize the matching of ports with larger degrees and causes longer delays at the low-degree ports. Our algorithm, however, achieves a lower average delay but without compromising the throughput. The DSM algorithm sorts nodes based on their node-degrees and begin each iteration of the algorithm by matching the lowest degree nodes. Using real gateway traffic traces as well as synthetically generated traffic, we present simulation results showing that DSM achieves a low average delay, while still achieving near maximum throughput. Madhusudan Hosaagrahara, Harish Sethu |
ICCCN | 1 |