Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vijeta Johri

dblp:26/6852 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 77% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
SIMD
0.112006
A defect tolerant self-organizing nanoscale SIMD architecture · ASPLOS 2006
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
defect tolerance
0.012006
A defect tolerant self-organizing nanoscale SIMD architecture · ASPLOS 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-assembly · 0.1data parallel programming model · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 A defect tolerant self-organizing nanoscale SIMD architecture
abstract
The continual decrease in transistor size (through either scaled CMOS or emerging nano-technologies) promises to usher in an era of tera to peta-scale integration. However, this decrease in size is also likely to increase defect densities, contributing to the exponentially increasing cost of top-down lithography. Bottom-up manufacturing techniques, like self assembly, may provide a viable lower-cost alternative to top-down lithography, but may also be prone to higher defects. Therefore, regardless of fabrication methodology, defect tolerant architectures are necessary to exploit the full potential of future increased device densities.This paper explores a defect tolerant SIMD architecture. A key feature of our design is the ability of a large number of limited capability nodes with high defect rates (up to 30%) to self-organize into a set of SIMD processing elements. Despite node simplicity and high defect rates, we show that by supporting the familiar data parallel programming model the architecture can execute a variety of programs. The architecture efficiently exploits a large number of nodes and higher device densities to keep device switching speeds and power density low. On a medium sized system (~1cm2 area), the performance of the proposed architecture on our data parallel programs matches or exceeds the performance of an aggressively scaled out-of-order processor (128-wide, 8k reorder buffer, perfect memory system). For larger systems (>1cm2), the proposed architecture can match the performance of a chip multiprocessor with 16 aggressively scaled out-of-order cores.
Jaidev P. Patwardhan, Vijeta Johri, Chris Dwyer, Alvin R. Lebeck
ASPLOS2