Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jack Hong

dblp:26/6896 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 46% Language models and text generation · 30% Vision and language · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompt tuning
0.912025
DynaPrompt: Dynamic Test-Time Prompt Tuning · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
test-time adaptation
0.912025
DynaPrompt: Dynamic Test-Time Prompt Tuning · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › test-time adaptation
test-time prompt tuning
0.912025
DynaPrompt: Dynamic Test-Time Prompt Tuning · ICLR 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.912025
DynaPrompt: Dynamic Test-Time Prompt Tuning · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model inference
inference-time adaptation
0.312025
DynaPrompt: Dynamic Test-Time Prompt Tuning · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

prediction entropy · 0.9online prompt buffer · 0.9dynamic prompt appending · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 DynaPrompt: Dynamic Test-Time Prompt Tuning
abstract
Test-time prompt tuning enhances zero-shot generalization of vision-language models but tends to ignore the relatedness among test samples during inference. Online test-time prompt tuning provides a simple way to leverage the information in previous test samples, albeit with the risk of prompt collapse due to error accumulation. To enhance test-time prompt tuning, we propose DynaPrompt, short for dynamic test-time prompt tuning, exploiting relevant data distribution information while reducing error accumulation. Built on an online prompt buffer, DynaPrompt adaptively selects and optimizes the relevant prompts for each test sample during tuning. Specifically, we introduce a dynamic prompt selection strategy based on two metrics: prediction entropy and probability difference. For unseen test data information, we develop dynamic prompt appending, which allows the buffer to append new prompts and delete the inactive ones. By doing so, the prompts are optimized to exploit beneficial information on specific test data, while alleviating error accumulation. Experiments on fourteen datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of dynamic test-time prompt tuning.
Zehao Xiao, Shilin Yan, Jack Hong, Jiayin Cai, Yao Hu 0002, Cheems Wang, Cees Snoek
ICLR3
2020 Trustworthiness Perceptions in Code Review: An Eye-tracking Study
abstract
Background: Automated program repair and other bug-fixing approaches are gaining attention in the software engineering community. Automation shows promise in reducing bug fixing costs. However, many developers express reluctance about accepting machine-generated patches into their codebases.
Ian Bertram, Jack Hong, Yu Huang 0015, Westley Weimer, Zohreh Sharafi
ESEM2