Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mircea Trofin
dblp:26/7039
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-4716-3400ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 62% Requirements engineering and software design · 38% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution
program comprehension |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Extracting Interactions in Component-Based Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2008 |
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture › component-based software engineering
component-based systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Extracting Interactions in Component-Based Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2008 |
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Extracting Interactions in Component-Based Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
finite state machine · 0.1dynamic analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | The Next 700 ML-Enabled Compiler OptimizationsabstractThere is a growing interest in enhancing compiler optimizations with ML models, yet interactions between compilers and ML frameworks remain challenging. Some optimizations require tightly coupled models and compiler internals, raising issues with modularity, performance and framework independence. Practical deployment and transparency for the end-user are also important concerns. We propose ML-Compiler-Bridge to enable ML model development within a traditional Python framework while making end-to-end integration with an optimizing compiler possible and efficient. We evaluate it on both research and production use cases, for training and inference, over several optimization problems, multiple compilers and its versions, and gym infrastructures. S. VenkataKeerthy, Umesh Kalvakuntla, Pranav Sai Gorantla, Rajiv Shailesh Chitale, Eugene Brevdo, Albert Cohen 0001, Mircea Trofin, Ramakrishna Upadrasta |
CC | 8 |
| 2008 | Static verification of component composition in contextual composition frameworks
Mircea Trofin, John Murphy 0001 |
Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. | 1 |
| 2008 | Extracting Interactions in Component-Based SystemsabstractMonitoring, analysing and understanding component based enterprise software systems are challenging tasks. These tasks are essential in solving and preventing performance and quality problems. Obtaining component level interactions which show the relationships between different software entities is a necessary prerequisite for such efforts. This paper focuses on component based Java applications, currently widely used by industry. They pose specific challenges while raising interesting opportunities for component level interaction extraction tools. We present a range of representative approaches for dynamically obtaining and using component interactions. For each approach we detail the needs it addresses, and the technical requirements for building an implementation of the approach. We also take a critical look at the different available implementations of the various techniques presented. We give performance and functional considerations and contrast them against each other by outlining their relative advantages and disadvantages. Based on this data, developers and system integrators can better understand the current state-of-the-art and the implications of choosing or implementing different dynamic interaction extraction techniques. Trevor Parsons, Adrian Mos, Mircea Trofin, Thomas Gschwind, John Murphy 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 3 |