Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mircea Trofin

dblp:26/7039 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-4716-3400ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 62% Requirements engineering and software design · 38%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
program comprehension
0.112008
Extracting Interactions in Component-Based Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2008
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture › component-based software engineering
component-based systems
0.012008
Extracting Interactions in Component-Based Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2008
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.012008
Extracting Interactions in Component-Based Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

finite state machine · 0.1dynamic analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 The Next 700 ML-Enabled Compiler Optimizations
abstract
There is a growing interest in enhancing compiler optimizations with ML models, yet interactions between compilers and ML frameworks remain challenging. Some optimizations require tightly coupled models and compiler internals, raising issues with modularity, performance and framework independence. Practical deployment and transparency for the end-user are also important concerns. We propose ML-Compiler-Bridge to enable ML model development within a traditional Python framework while making end-to-end integration with an optimizing compiler possible and efficient. We evaluate it on both research and production use cases, for training and inference, over several optimization problems, multiple compilers and its versions, and gym infrastructures.
S. VenkataKeerthy, Umesh Kalvakuntla, Pranav Sai Gorantla, Rajiv Shailesh Chitale, Eugene Brevdo, Albert Cohen 0001, Mircea Trofin, Ramakrishna Upadrasta
CC8
2008 Static verification of component composition in contextual composition frameworks
Mircea Trofin, John Murphy 0001
Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf.1
2008 Extracting Interactions in Component-Based Systems
abstract
Monitoring, analysing and understanding component based enterprise software systems are challenging tasks. These tasks are essential in solving and preventing performance and quality problems. Obtaining component level interactions which show the relationships between different software entities is a necessary prerequisite for such efforts. This paper focuses on component based Java applications, currently widely used by industry. They pose specific challenges while raising interesting opportunities for component level interaction extraction tools. We present a range of representative approaches for dynamically obtaining and using component interactions. For each approach we detail the needs it addresses, and the technical requirements for building an implementation of the approach. We also take a critical look at the different available implementations of the various techniques presented. We give performance and functional considerations and contrast them against each other by outlining their relative advantages and disadvantages. Based on this data, developers and system integrators can better understand the current state-of-the-art and the implications of choosing or implementing different dynamic interaction extraction techniques.
Trevor Parsons, Adrian Mos, Mircea Trofin, Thomas Gschwind, John Murphy 0001
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.3