Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mina Saleeb

dblp:26/7992 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data integration and cleaning · 56% Query processing and optimization · 36% Data models and query languages · 8%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Query processing and optimization › top-k query processing
rank join
0.112010
MashRank: Towards uncertainty-aware and rank-aware mashups · ICDE 2010
Query processing and optimization › top-k query processing
rank-aware query processing
0.012010
Building Ranked Mashups of Unstructured Sources with Uncertain Information · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2010
Data models and query languages
uncertain data
0.012010
MashRank: Towards uncertainty-aware and rank-aware mashups · ICDE 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic model · 0.1probabilistic database · 0.1monte carlo sampling · 0.1information extraction · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 MashRank: Towards uncertainty-aware and rank-aware mashups
abstract
Mashups are situational applications that build data flows to link the contents of multiple Web sources. Often times, ranking the results of a mashup is handled in a materialize-then-sort fashion, since combining multiple data sources usually destroys their original rankings. Moreover, although uncertainty is ubiquitous on the Web, most mashup tools do not reason about or reflect such uncertainty. We introduce MashRank, a mashup tool that treats ranking as a first-class citizen in mashup construction, and allows for rank-joining Web sources with uncertain information. To the best of our knowledge, no current tools allow for similar functionalities. MashRank encapsulates a new probabilistic model reflecting uncertainty in ranking, a set of techniques implemented as pipelined operators in mashup plans, and a probabilistic ranking infrastructure based on Monte-Carlo sampling.
Mohamed A. Soliman, Mina Saleeb, Ihab F. Ilyas
ICDE2
2010 Building Ranked Mashups of Unstructured Sources with Uncertain Information
abstract
Mashups are situational applications that join multiple sources to better meet the information needs of Web users. Web sources can be huge databases behind query interfaces, which triggers the need of ranking mashup results based on some user preferences. We present MashRank, a mashup authoring and processing system building on concepts from rank-aware processing, probabilistic databases, and information extraction to enable ranked mashups of (unstructured) sources with uncertain ranking attributes. MashRank is based on new semantics, formulations and processing techniques to handle uncertain preference scores, represented as intervals enclosing possible score values. MashRank integrates information extraction with query processing by asynchronously pushing extracted data on-the-fly into pipelined rank-aware query plans, and using ranking early-out requirements to limit extraction cost. To the best of our knowledge, both the technical problems and target applications of MashRank have not been addressed before.
Mohamed A. Soliman, Ihab F. Ilyas, Mina Saleeb
Proc. VLDB Endow.3