EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sambhu H. Karumanchi
dblp:260/0005
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 44% Motion planning and robot control · 32% Robot navigation and mapping · 25% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Robust Model Based Reinforcement Learning Using L1 Adaptive Control · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
robust reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Robust Model Based Reinforcement Learning Using L1 Adaptive Control · ICLR 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › trajectory tracking
closed-loop trajectory tracking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Closed-Loop Benchmarking of Stereo Visual-Inertial SLAM Systems: Understanding the Impact of Drift and Latency on Tracking Accuracy · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Closed-Loop Benchmarking of Stereo Visual-Inertial SLAM Systems: Understanding the Impact of Drift and Latency on Tracking Accuracy · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
trajectory tracking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Closed-Loop Benchmarking of Stereo Visual-Inertial SLAM Systems: Understanding the Impact of Drift and Latency on Tracking Accuracy · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › SLAM › multi-sensor SLAM
visual-inertial SLAM |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Closed-Loop Benchmarking of Stereo Visual-Inertial SLAM Systems: Understanding the Impact of Drift and Latency on Tracking Accuracy · ICRA 2020 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Closed-Loop Benchmarking of Stereo Visual-Inertial SLAM Systems: Understanding the Impact of Drift and Latency on Tracking Accuracy · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
adaptive control |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Robust Model Based Reinforcement Learning Using L1 Adaptive Control · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.9latency analysis · 0.9drift analysis · 0.9l1 adaptive control · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Energy-constrained multi-robot exploration for autonomous map buildingabstractWe consider the problem of building the map of an unknown environment using multiple mobile robots that have physical limitations arising from dynamics and a limited onboard battery. We consider the setting where the unknown environment has a set of charging stations that the robots must discover and visit often to recharge their battery during the map building process. We propose an iterative approach to solve the resulting energy-constrained multi-robot exploration problem. Our approach uses a combination of frontier-based exploration, graph-based path planning, and multi-robot task assignment. We show that our algorithm admits a computationally inexpensive implementation that enables rapid replanning, and propose sufficient conditions for recursive feasibility and finite-time termination. We validate our approach in several Gazebo-based realistic simulations. Sambhu H. Karumanchi, Bhagawan Rokaha, Alexander Schperberg, Abraham P. Vinod |
IROS | 1 |
| 2024 | Robust Model Based Reinforcement Learning Using L1 Adaptive Control
Minjun Sung, Sambhu H. Karumanchi, Aditya Gahlawat, Naira Hovakimyan |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | Autonomous UAV Navigation in Complex Environments using Human FeedbackabstractAutonomous navigation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) has real-life applications in remote sensing, wildlife surveillance, search and rescue operations. A popular training paradigm to learn optimal actions for navigating such complex, dynamic, and uncertain environments is Reinforcement Learning (RL), where the optimal decisions are learnt over time through a reward-feedback received from the environment. However, manually constructing a feedback function that can help guide the UAV to accomplish the desired objective is often very hard. Preference-based Reinforcement Learning (PbRL) is an emerging sub-field of RL where the manual construction of reward function is replaced with human feedback. In this setting, a human is presented with a pair of trajectories followed by the RL agent to elicit the subject’s preference for one over the other. A PbRL algorithm would then compute an optimal sequence of actions using just the set of preferences collected over different trajectories. In this work, we consider PbRL for UAV navigation and follow an ensemble approach to enhance navigation performance. We demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed algorithm through experiments on a range of complex environments and tasks. Ours is the first work that uses human preferences to solve the UAV navigation problem to the best of our knowledge. Sambhu H. Karumanchi, Raghuram Bharadwaj Diddigi, Prabuchandran K. J., Shalabh Bhatnagar |
RO-MAN | 1 |
| 2020 | Closed-Loop Benchmarking of Stereo Visual-Inertial SLAM Systems: Understanding the Impact of Drift and Latency on Tracking AccuracyabstractVisual-inertial SLAM is essential for robot navigation in GPS-denied environments, e.g. indoor, underground. Conventionally, the performance of visual-inertial SLAM is evaluated with open-loop analysis, with a focus on the drift level of SLAM systems. In this paper, we raise the question on the importance of visual estimation latency in closed-loop navigation tasks, such as accurate trajectory tracking. To understand the impact of both drift and latency on visualinertial SLAM systems, a closed-loop benchmarking simulation is conducted, where a robot is commanded to follow a desired trajectory using the feedback from visual-inertial estimation. By extensively evaluating the trajectory tracking performance of representative state-of-the-art visual-inertial SLAM systems, we reveal the importance of latency reduction in visual estimation module of these systems. The findings suggest directions of future improvements for visual-inertial SLAM. Yipu Zhao, Justin S. Smith, Sambhu H. Karumanchi, Patricio A. Vela |
ICRA | 3 |