Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wanqiu Long
dblp:260/0277
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 48% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25% Question answering and dialogue systems · 22% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis
discourse relation recognition |
1.0 | 2 | 2022 | Facilitating Contrastive Learning of Discourse Relational Senses by Exploiting the Hierarchy of Sense Relations · EMNLP 2022 TED-CDB: A Large-Scale Chinese Discourse Relation Dataset on TED Talks · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
multi-hop question answering |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | MINTQA: A Multi-Hop Question Answering Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on New and Long-tail Knowledge · ACL (1) 2026 |
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | MINTQA: A Multi-Hop Question Answering Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on New and Long-tail Knowledge · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis
discourse parsing |
0.6 | 2 | 2022 | TED-CDB: A Large-Scale Chinese Discourse Relation Dataset on TED Talks · EMNLP (1) 2020 Facilitating Contrastive Learning of Discourse Relational Senses by Exploiting the Hierarchy of Sense Relations · EMNLP 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Facilitating Contrastive Learning of Discourse Relational Senses by Exploiting the Hierarchy of Sense Relations · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › discourse analysis › discourse relation recognition
implicit discourse relation recognition |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Facilitating Contrastive Learning of Discourse Relational Senses by Exploiting the Hierarchy of Sense Relations · EMNLP 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
supervised contrastive learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Facilitating Contrastive Learning of Discourse Relational Senses by Exploiting the Hierarchy of Sense Relations · EMNLP 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-domain transfer |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | TED-CDB: A Large-Scale Chinese Discourse Relation Dataset on TED Talks · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-lingual transfer |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | TED-CDB: A Large-Scale Chinese Discourse Relation Dataset on TED Talks · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval-augmented generation · 2.0large language model evaluation · 2.0negative sampling · 0.6contrastive learning · 0.6transfer learning · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | MINTQA: A Multi-Hop Question Answering Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on New and Long-tail KnowledgeabstractRetrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by integrating external knowledge, enabling them to tackle knowledge-intensive tasks. However, limited research has explored how LLMs effectively leverage RAG techniques for multi-hop question answering (QA), particularly when handling knowledge with with varying degrees of familiarity. In this paper, we introduce MINTQA (Multi-hop Question Answering on New and Tail Knowledge), a benchmark designed to evaluate multi-hop QA performance on questions involving 10,479 question-answer pairs for evaluating old/new knowledge and 17,887 pairs for assessing popular/unpopular knowledge, with each question equipped with corresponding sub-questions and answers. This benchmark primarily evaluates the multi-hop reasoning ability of LLMs and their capacity to handle knowledge with varying levels of familiarity during the reasoning process. We evaluate 22 state-of-the-art LLMs using three distinct QA strategies: LLM-based parameterized knowledge QA, direct RAG-enhanced QA, and multi-hop RAG-enhanced QA. Our experiments reveal key challenges in how LLMs handle knowledge with different familiarity and offer insights into improving their multi-hop reasoning capabilities when combined with RAG techniques. Jie He 0004, Nan Hu 0004, Wanqiu Long, Jiaoyan Chen 0001, Jeff Z. Pan |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2025 | Evaluating and Improving Graph to Text Generation with Large Language ModelsabstractJie He, Yijun Yang, Wanqiu Long, Deyi Xiong, Victor Gutierrez Basulto, Jeff Z. Pan. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Jie He 0004, Wanqiu Long, Deyi Xiong, Víctor Gutiérrez-Basulto, Jeff Z. Pan |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 3 |
| 2022 | Facilitating Contrastive Learning of Discourse Relational Senses by Exploiting the Hierarchy of Sense RelationsabstractImplicit discourse relation recognition is a challenging task that involves identifying the sense or senses that hold between two adjacent spans of text, in the absense of an explicit connective between them.In both PDTB-2 (Prasad et al., 2008) and PDTB-3 (Webber et al., 2019), discourse relational senses are organized into a three-level hierarchy ranging from four broad top-level senses, to more specific senses below them.Most previous work on implicitf discourse relation recognition have used the sense hierarchy simply to indicate what sense labels were available.Here we do more -incorporating the sense hierarchy into the recognition process itself and using it to select the negative examples used in contrastive learning.With no additional effort, the approach achieves stateof-the-art performance on the task.Our code is released in https://github.com/wanqiulong0923/Contrastive_IDRR. Wanqiu Long, Bonnie L. Webber |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2020 | TED-CDB: A Large-Scale Chinese Discourse Relation Dataset on TED TalksabstractAs different genres are known to differ in their communicative properties and as previously, for Chinese, discourse relations have only been annotated over news text, we have created the TED-CDB dataset.TED-CDB comprises a large set of TED talks in Chinese that have been manually annotated according to the goals and principles of Penn Discourse Treebank, but adapted to features that are not present in English.It serves as a unique Chinese corpus of spoken discourse.Benchmark experiments show that TED-CDB poses a challenge for state-of-the-art discourse relation classifiers, whose F1 performance on 4way classification is <60%.This is a dramatic drop of 35% from performance on the news text in the Chinese Discourse Treebank.Transfer learning experiments have been carried out with the TED-CDB for both same-language cross-domain transfer and same-domain crosslanguage transfer.Both demonstrate that the TED-CDB can improve the performance of systems being developed for languages other than Chinese and would be helpful for insufficient or unbalanced data in other corpora.The dataset and our Chinese annotation guidelines has been made freely available.1 Wanqiu Long, Bonnie L. Webber, Deyi Xiong |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2020 | Shallow Discourse Annotation for Chinese TED TalksabstractText corpora annotated with language-related properties are an important resource for the development of Language Technology. The current work contributes a new resource for Chinese Language Technology and for Chinese-English translation, in the form of a set of TED talks (some originally given in English, some in Chinese) that have been annotated with discourse relations in the style of the Penn Discourse TreeBank, adapted to properties of Chinese text that are not present in English. The resource is currently unique in annotating discourse-level properties of planned spoken monologues rather than of written text. An inter-annotator agreement study demonstrates that the annotation scheme is able to achieve highly reliable results. Wanqiu Long, Xinyi Cai, James E. M. Reid, Bonnie L. Webber, Deyi Xiong |
LREC | 1 |