Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul Batum
dblp:260/0293
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-4494-6270ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloud and datacenter computing
serverless computing |
1.4 | 2 | 2026 | DROPS: Managing Serverless Resource Pools in Microsoft Azure Functions · EuroSys 2026 Serverless in the Wild: Characterizing and Optimizing the Serverless Workload at a Large Cloud Provider · USENIX ATC 2020 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource management › resource pooling
resource pool management |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | DROPS: Managing Serverless Resource Pools in Microsoft Azure Functions · EuroSys 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
SLO-based pool sizing · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | DROPS: Managing Serverless Resource Pools in Microsoft Azure FunctionsabstractAzure Functions maintains pools of pre-warmed containers to avoid the high container-allocation latency. The size of a pool is important: a pool that is too small leads to high allocation latency, whereas a pool that is too large wastes resources and increases cost. Service providers typically oversize pools to meet service-level objectives (SLOs). Our findings indicate that the cost of maintaining pre-warmed container pools dominates the overall platform cost, motivating the need for effective pool management strategies. Ahmed Alquraan, Abdelrahman Baba, Rafael Mendes da Silva, Sameh Elnikety, Paul Batum, Hamid Henry Safi, Seth Fine, Samer Al-Kiswany |
EuroSys | 5 |
| 2021 | Faa$T: A Transparent Auto-Scaling Cache for Serverless ApplicationsabstractFunction-as-a-Service (FaaS) has become an increasingly popular way for users to deploy their applications without the burden of managing the underlying infrastructure. However, existing FaaS platforms rely on remote storage to maintain state, limiting the set of applications that can be run efficiently. Recent caching work for FaaS platforms has tried to address this problem, but has fallen short: it disregards the widely different characteristics of FaaS applications, does not scale the cache based on data access patterns, or requires changes to applications. To address these limitations, we present Faa$T, a transparent auto-scaling distributed cache for serverless applications. Each application gets its own cache. After a function executes and the application becomes inactive, the cache is unloaded from memory with the application. Upon reloading for the next invocation, Faa$T pre-warms the cache with objects likely to be accessed. In addition to traditional compute-based scaling, Faa$T scales based on working set and object sizes to manage cache space and I/O bandwidth. We motivate our design with a comprehensive study of data access patterns on Azure Functions. We implement Faa$T for Azure Functions, and show that Faa$T can improve performance by up to 92% (57% on average) for challenging applications, and reduce cost for most users compared to state-of-the-art caching systems, i.e. the cost of having to stand up additional serverful resources. Francisco Romero, Gohar Irfan Chaudhry, Íñigo Goiri, Pragna Gopa, Paul Batum, Neeraja J. Yadwadkar, Rodrigo Fonseca, Christoforos E. Kozyrakis, Ricardo Bianchini |
SoCC | 5 |
| 2020 | Serverless in the Wild: Characterizing and Optimizing the Serverless Workload at a Large Cloud Provider
Mohammad Shahrad, Rodrigo Fonseca, Íñigo Goiri, Gohar Irfan Chaudhry, Paul Batum, Jason Cooke, Eduardo Laureano, Colby Tresness, Mark Russinovich, Ricardo Bianchini |
USENIX ATC | 5 |