Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Edric Tam

dblp:260/0433 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 67% Deep learning architectures and training · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph regularization
0.412020
Fiedler Regularization: Learning Neural Networks with Graph Sparsity · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.412020
Fiedler Regularization: Learning Neural Networks with Graph Sparsity · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Graph learning
spectral graph theory
0.412020
Fiedler Regularization: Learning Neural Networks with Graph Sparsity · ICML 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

variational approximation · 0.4spectral graph theory · 0.4l1 penalty · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Fiedler Regularization: Learning Neural Networks with Graph Sparsity
abstract
We introduce a novel regularization approach for deep learning that incorporates and respects the underlying graphical structure of the neural network. Existing regularization methods often focus on penalizing weights in a global/uniform manner that ignores the connectivity structure of the neural network. We propose to use the Fiedler value of the neural network’s underlying graph as a tool for regularization. We provide theoretical support for this approach via spectral graph theory. We show several useful properties of the Fiedler value that make it suitable for regularization. We provide an approximate, variational approach for faster computation during training. We provide an alternative formulation of this framework in the form of a structurally weighted L1 penalty, thus linking our approach to sparsity induction. We performed experiments on datasets that compare Fiedler regularization with traditional regularization methods such as Dropout and weight decay. Results demonstrate the efficacy of Fiedler regularization.
Edric Tam, David B. Dunson
ICML1