Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Edric Tam
dblp:260/0433
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 67% Deep learning architectures and training · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Fiedler Regularization: Learning Neural Networks with Graph Sparsity · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Fiedler Regularization: Learning Neural Networks with Graph Sparsity · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
spectral graph theory |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Fiedler Regularization: Learning Neural Networks with Graph Sparsity · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational approximation · 0.4spectral graph theory · 0.4l1 penalty · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Fiedler Regularization: Learning Neural Networks with Graph SparsityabstractWe introduce a novel regularization approach for deep learning that incorporates and respects the underlying graphical structure of the neural network. Existing regularization methods often focus on penalizing weights in a global/uniform manner that ignores the connectivity structure of the neural network. We propose to use the Fiedler value of the neural network’s underlying graph as a tool for regularization. We provide theoretical support for this approach via spectral graph theory. We show several useful properties of the Fiedler value that make it suitable for regularization. We provide an approximate, variational approach for faster computation during training. We provide an alternative formulation of this framework in the form of a structurally weighted L1 penalty, thus linking our approach to sparsity induction. We performed experiments on datasets that compare Fiedler regularization with traditional regularization methods such as Dropout and weight decay. Results demonstrate the efficacy of Fiedler regularization. Edric Tam, David B. Dunson |
ICML | 1 |