Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aaron J. Molstad

dblp:260/0673 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 54% Representation and self-supervised learning · 26% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification
0.812024
Multi-Response Linear Discriminant Analysis in High Dimensions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › discriminant analysis
linear discriminant analysis
0.812024
Multi-Response Linear Discriminant Analysis in High Dimensions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional regression
0.612022
New Insights for the Multivariate Square-Root Lasso · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
multivariate regression
0.612022
New Insights for the Multivariate Square-Root Lasso · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.612022
New Insights for the Multivariate Square-Root Lasso · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional statistics
0.212024
Multi-Response Linear Discriminant Analysis in High Dimensions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

first-order methods · 1.1alternating direction method of multipliers · 1.1overlapping group lasso · 0.8blockwise coordinate descent · 0.8ADMM · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Multi-Response Linear Discriminant Analysis in High Dimensions
abstract
The problem of classifying multiple categorical responses is fundamental in modern machine learning and statistics, with diverse applications in fields such as bioinformatics and imaging. This manuscript investigates linear discriminant analysis (LDA) with high-dimensional predictors and multiple multi-class responses. Specifically, we first examine two different classification scenarios under the bivariate LDA model: joint classification of the two responses and conditional classification of one response while observing the other. To achieve optimal classification rules for both scenarios, we introduce two novel tensor formulations of the discriminant coefficients and corresponding regularization strategies. For joint classification, we propose an overlapping group lasso penalty and a blockwise coordinate descent algorithm to efficiently compute the joint discriminant coefficient tensors. For conditional classification, we utilize an alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) algorithm to compute the discriminant coefficient tensors under new constraints. We then extend our method and algorithms to general multivariate responses. Finally, we validate the effectiveness of our approach through simulation studies and applications to benchmark datasets.
Xin Zhang 0132, Aaron J. Molstad
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2022 New Insights for the Multivariate Square-Root Lasso
abstract
We study the multivariate square-root lasso, a method for fitting the multivariate response linear regression model with dependent errors. This estimator minimizes the nuclear norm of the residual matrix plus a convex penalty. Unlike existing methods that require explicit estimates of the error precision (inverse covariance) matrix, the multivariate square-root lasso implicitly accounts for error dependence and is the solution to a convex optimization problem. We establish error bounds which reveal that like the univariate square-root lasso, the multivariate square-root lasso is pivotal with respect to the unknown error covariance matrix. In addition, we propose a variation of the alternating direction method of multipliers algorithm to compute the estimator and discuss an accelerated first order algorithm that can be applied in certain cases. In both simulation studies and a genomic data application, we show that the multivariate square-root lasso can outperform more computationally intensive methods that require explicit estimation of the error precision matrix.
Aaron J. Molstad
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1