Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dong-Kyum Kim

dblp:260/0772 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-6630-2181ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 51% Language models and text generation · 49%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning
unsupervised embedding learning
0.812024
SUBTLE: An Unsupervised Platform with Temporal Link Embedding that Maps Animal Behavior · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
behavioral analysis
0.812024
SUBTLE: An Unsupervised Platform with Temporal Link Embedding that Maps Animal Behavior · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2024
Data mining
clustering
0.212024
SUBTLE: An Unsupervised Platform with Temporal Link Embedding that Maps Animal Behavior · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

temporal proximity index · 2.3spectrogram analysis · 2.3UMAP · 2.3controlled synthetic corpus experiments · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 How Training Data Shapes the Use of Parametric and In-Context Knowledge in Language Models
abstract
Large language models leverage both parametric knowledge acquired during pretraining and in-context knowledge provided at inference time.Crucially, when these sources conflict, models arbitrate based on their internal confidence, preferring parametric knowledge for high-confidence facts while deferring to context for less familiar ones.However, the training conditions that give rise to these fundamental behaviors remain unclear.Here we conduct controlled experiments using synthetic corpora to identify the specific data properties that shape knowledge utilization.Our results reveal a counterintuitive finding: the robust, balanced use of both knowledge sources is an emergent property that requires the cooccurrence of three factors typically considered detrimental, including (i) intra-document repetition, (ii) a moderate degree of intra-document inconsistency, and (iii) a skewed knowledge distribution.We further show that these dynamics arise in real-world language model pretraining and analyze how post-training procedures reshape arbitration strategies.Together, our findings provide empirical guidance for designing training data that supports the reliable integration of parametric and in-context knowledge in language models.
Dong-Kyum Kim, Jea Kwon, Nakyeong Yang, Kyomin Jung, Meeyoung Cha
ACL (1)2
2024 SUBTLE: An Unsupervised Platform with Temporal Link Embedding that Maps Animal Behavior
abstract
Abstract While huge strides have recently been made in language-based machine learning, the ability of artificial systems to comprehend the sequences that comprise animal behavior has been lagging behind. In contrast, humans instinctively recognize behaviors by finding similarities in behavioral sequences. Here, we develop an unsupervised behavior-mapping framework, SUBTLE (spectrogram-UMAP-based temporal-link embedding), to capture comparable behavioral repertoires from 3D action skeletons. To find the best embedding method, we devise a temporal proximity index (TPI) as a new metric to gauge temporal representation in the behavioral embedding space. The method achieves the best TPI score compared to current embedding strategies. Its spectrogram-based UMAP clustering not only identifies subtle inter-group differences but also matches human-annotated labels. SUBTLE framework automates the tasks of both identifying behavioral repertoires like walking, grooming, standing, and rearing, and profiling individual behavior signatures like subtle inter-group differences by age. SUBTLE highlights the importance of temporal representation in the behavioral embedding space for human-like behavioral categorization.
Jea Kwon, Sunpil Kim, Dong-Kyum Kim, Jinhyeong Joo, SoHyung Kim, Meeyoung Cha, C. Justin Lee
Int. J. Comput. Vis.3