Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christopher M. Biwer

dblp:260/4347 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-5946-2467ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 33% High-performance computing · 33% Performance modeling and evaluation · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems
data reduction
0.412020
Foresight: analysis that matters for data reduction · SC 2020
High-performance computing
lossy compression
0.412020
Foresight: analysis that matters for data reduction · SC 2020
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization
0.412020
Foresight: analysis that matters for data reduction · SC 2020
Computational science and engineering › cosmology
cosmological simulation
0.112020
Foresight: analysis that matters for data reduction · SC 2020
Computational science and engineering › computational fluid dynamics › turbulence simulation
direct numerical simulation
0.112020
Foresight: analysis that matters for data reduction · SC 2020
Computational science and engineering › computational fluid dynamics
turbulence simulation
0.112020
Foresight: analysis that matters for data reduction · SC 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sampling · 0.9data compression · 0.9autoencoder · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Understanding GPU-Based Lossy Compression for Extreme-Scale Cosmological Simulations
abstract
To help understand our universe better, researchers and scientists currently run extreme-scale cosmology simulations on leadership supercomputers. However, such simulations can generate large amounts of scientific data, which often result in expensive costs in data associated with data movement and storage. Lossy compression techniques have become attractive because they significantly reduce data size and can maintain high data fidelity for post-analysis. In this paper, we propose to use GPU-based lossy compression for extreme-scale cosmological simulations. Our contributions are threefold: (1) we implement multiple GPU-based lossy compressors to our open-source compression benchmark and analysis framework named Foresight; (2) we use Foresight to comprehensively evaluate the practicality of using GPU-based lossy compression on two real-world extreme-scale cosmology simulations, namely HACC and Nyx, based on a series of assessment metrics; and (3) we develop a general optimization guideline on how to determine the best-fit configurations for different lossy compressors and cosmological simulations. Experiments show that GPU-based lossy compression can provide necessary accuracy on post-analysis for cosmological simulations and high compression ratio of 5 ~ 15× on the tested datasets, as well as much higher compression and decompression throughput than CPU-based compressors.
Sian Jin, Pascal Grosset, Christopher M. Biwer, Jesus Pulido, Jiannan Tian, Dingwen Tao, James P. Ahrens
IPDPS3
2020 Foresight: analysis that matters for data reduction
abstract
As the computation power of supercomputers increases, so does simulation size, which in turn produces orders-of-magnitude more data. Because generated data often exceed the simulation's disk quota, many simulations would stand to benefit from data-reduction techniques to reduce storage requirements. Such techniques include autoencoders, data compression algorithms, and sampling. Lossy compression techniques can significantly reduce data size, but such techniques come at the expense of losing information that could result in incorrect post hoc analysis results. To help scientists determine the best compression they can get while keeping their analyses accurate, we have developed Foresight, an analysis framework that enables users to evaluate how different data-reduction techniques will impact their analyses. We use particle data from a cosmology simulation, turbulence data from Direct Numerical Simulation, and asteroid impact data from xRage to demonstrate how Foresight can help scientists determine the best data-reduction technique for their simulations.
Pascal Grosset, Christopher M. Biwer, Jesus Pulido, Arvind T. Mohan, Ayan Biswas 0001, John Patchett, Terece L. Turton, David H. Rogers 0001, Daniel Livescu, James P. Ahrens
SC2