Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jacob Granley

dblp:260/5940 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-9024-2454ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 72% Optimization for machine learning · 28%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics
neural prosthesis
1.222023
Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Deep Stimulus Encoding in Visual Prostheses · NeurIPS 2023
Hybrid Neural Autoencoders for Stimulus Encoding in Visual and Other Sensory Neuroprostheses · NeurIPS 2022
Medical and health informatics
stimulus encoding
1.222023
Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Deep Stimulus Encoding in Visual Prostheses · NeurIPS 2023
Hybrid Neural Autoencoders for Stimulus Encoding in Visual and Other Sensory Neuroprostheses · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
biologically inspired neural network
0.712023
Explaining V1 Properties with a Biologically Constrained Deep Learning Architecture · NeurIPS 2023
Medical and health informatics › neural prosthesis
visual prosthesis
0.712023
Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Deep Stimulus Encoding in Visual Prostheses · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization
0.212023
Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Deep Stimulus Encoding in Visual Prostheses · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network
0.212023
Explaining V1 Properties with a Biologically Constrained Deep Learning Architecture · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization › bayesian optimization
preferential bayesian optimization
0.212023
Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Deep Stimulus Encoding in Visual Prostheses · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
autoencoder
0.212022
Hybrid Neural Autoencoders for Stimulus Encoding in Visual and Other Sensory Neuroprostheses · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

forward model inversion · 2.5deep encoder network · 1.3bayesian optimization · 1.3end-to-end optimization · 1.1deep neural network · 1.1tuned normalization · 0.7cortical magnification · 0.7center-surround antagonism · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Deep Stimulus Encoding in Visual Prostheses
abstract
Neuroprostheses show potential in restoring lost sensory function and enhancing human capabilities, but the sensations produced by current devices often seem unnatural or distorted. Exact placement of implants and differences in individual perception lead to significant variations in stimulus response, making personalized stimulus optimization a key challenge. Bayesian optimization could be used to optimize patient-specific stimulation parameters with limited noisy observations, but is not feasible for high-dimensional stimuli. Alternatively, deep learning models can optimize stimulus encoding strategies, but typically assume perfect knowledge of patient-specific variations. Here we propose a novel, practically feasible approach that overcomes both of these fundamental limitations. First, a deep encoder network is trained to produce optimal stimuli for any individual patient by inverting a forward model mapping electrical stimuli to visual percepts. Second, a preferential Bayesian optimization strategy utilizes this encoder to learn the optimal patient-specific parameters for a new patient, using a minimal number of pairwise comparisons between candidate stimuli. We demonstrate the viability of this approach on a novel, state-of-the-art visual prosthesis model. Our approach quickly learns a personalized stimulus encoder and leads to dramatic improvements in the quality of restored vision, outperforming existing encoding strategies. Further, this approach is robust to noisy patient feedback and misspecifications in the underlying forward model. Overall, our results suggest that combining the strengths of deep learning and Bayesian optimization could significantly improve the perceptual experience of patients fitted with visual prostheses and may prove a viable solution for a range of neuroprosthetic technologies
Jacob Granley, Tristan Fauvel, Matthew Chalk, Michael Beyeler
NeurIPS1
2023 Explaining V1 Properties with a Biologically Constrained Deep Learning Architecture
abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have recently emerged as promising models of the ventral visual stream, despite their lack of biological specificity. While current state-of-the-art models of the primary visual cortex (V1) have surfaced from training with adversarial examples and extensively augmented data, these models are still unable to explain key neural properties observed in V1 that arise from biological circuitry. To address this gap, we systematically incorporated neuroscience-derived architectural components into CNNs to identify a set of mechanisms and architectures that more comprehensively explain V1 activity. Upon enhancing task-driven CNNs with architectural components that simulate center-surround antagonism, local receptive fields, tuned normalization, and cortical magnification, we uncover models with latent representations that yield state-of-the-art explanation of V1 neural activity and tuning properties. Moreover, analyses of the learned parameters of these components and stimuli that maximally activate neurons of the evaluated networks provide support for their role in explaining neural properties of V1. Our results highlight an important advancement in the field of NeuroAI, as we systematically establish a set of architectural components that contribute to unprecedented explanation of V1. The neuroscience insights that could be gleaned from increasingly accurate in-silico models of the brain have the potential to greatly advance the fields of both neuroscience and artificial intelligence.
Galen Pogoncheff, Jacob Granley, Michael Beyeler
NeurIPS2
2022 Hybrid Neural Autoencoders for Stimulus Encoding in Visual and Other Sensory Neuroprostheses
abstract
Sensory neuroprostheses are emerging as a promising technology to restore lost sensory function or augment human capabilities. However, sensations elicited by current devices often appear artificial and distorted. Although current models can predict the neural or perceptual response to an electrical stimulus, an optimal stimulation strategy solves the inverse problem: what is the required stimulus to produce a desired response? Here, we frame this as an end-to-end optimization problem, where a deep neural network stimulus encoder is trained to invert a known and fixed forward model that approximates the underlying biological system. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate the effectiveness of this Hybrid Neural Autoencoder (HNA) in visual neuroprostheses. We find that HNA produces high-fidelity patient-specific stimuli representing handwritten digits and segmented images of everyday objects, and significantly outperforms conventional encoding strategies across all simulated patients. Overall this is an important step towards the long-standing challenge of restoring high-quality vision to people living with incurable blindness and may prove a promising solution for a variety of neuroprosthetic technologies.
Jacob Granley, Lucas Relic, Michael Beyeler
NeurIPS1
2020 Attacking and Protecting Tunneled Traffic of Smart Home Devices
abstract
The number of smart home IoT (Internet of Things) devices has been growing fast in recent years. Along with the great benefits brought by smart home devices, new threats have appeared. One major threat to smart home users is the compromise of their privacy by traffic analysis (TA) attacks. Researchers have shown that TA attacks can be performed successfully on either plain or encrypted traffic to identify smart home devices and infer user activities. Tunneling traffic is a very strong countermeasure to existing TA attacks. However, in this work, we design a Signature based Tunneled Traffic Analysis (STTA) attack that can be effective even on tunneled traffic. Using a popular smart home traffic dataset, we demonstrate that our attack can achieve an 83% accuracy on identifying 14 smart home devices. We further design a simple defense mechanism based on adding uniform random noise to effectively protect against our TA attack without introducing too much overhead. We prove that our defense mechanism achieves approximate differential privacy.
Ahmed Alshehri, Jacob Granley, Chuan Yue
CODASPY2