Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhongying Qiao

dblp:260/6047 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0003-1276-4115ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
data trading
0.412019
AccountTrade: Accountability Against Dishonest Big Data Buyers and Sellers · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

uniqueness index · 0.4simulation · 0.4formal verification · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 AccountTrade: Accountability Against Dishonest Big Data Buyers and Sellers
abstract
In this paper, a set of accountable protocols denoted as AccountTrade is proposed for big data trading among dishonest consumers. For achieving a secure big data trading environment, AccountTrade achieves book-keeping ability and accountability against dishonest consumers throughout the trading (i.e., buying and selling) of datasets. We investigate the consumers' responsibilities in the dataset trading, then we design AccountTrade to achieve accountability against dishonest consumers that are likely to deviate from the responsibilities. Specifically, a uniqueness index is defined and proposed, which is a new rigorous measurement of the data uniqueness for this purpose. Furthermore, several accountable trading protocols are presented to enable data brokers to blame the misbehaving entities when misbehavior is detected. The accountability of AccountTrade is formally defined, proved, and evaluated by an automatic verification tool as well as extensive simulation with real-world datasets. Our evaluation shows that AccountTrade incurs at most 10-kB storage overhead per file, and it is capable of 8-1000 concurrent data upload requests per server.
Taeho Jung, Xiang-Yang Li 0001, Wenchao Huang 0001, Zhongying Qiao, Jianwei Qian, Junze Han, Jiahui Hou
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.4