Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhongying Qiao
dblp:260/6047
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0003-1276-4115ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Blockchain and cryptocurrency security
data trading |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | AccountTrade: Accountability Against Dishonest Big Data Buyers and Sellers · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
uniqueness index · 0.4simulation · 0.4formal verification · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | AccountTrade: Accountability Against Dishonest Big Data Buyers and SellersabstractIn this paper, a set of accountable protocols denoted as AccountTrade is proposed for big data trading among dishonest consumers. For achieving a secure big data trading environment, AccountTrade achieves book-keeping ability and accountability against dishonest consumers throughout the trading (i.e., buying and selling) of datasets. We investigate the consumers' responsibilities in the dataset trading, then we design AccountTrade to achieve accountability against dishonest consumers that are likely to deviate from the responsibilities. Specifically, a uniqueness index is defined and proposed, which is a new rigorous measurement of the data uniqueness for this purpose. Furthermore, several accountable trading protocols are presented to enable data brokers to blame the misbehaving entities when misbehavior is detected. The accountability of AccountTrade is formally defined, proved, and evaluated by an automatic verification tool as well as extensive simulation with real-world datasets. Our evaluation shows that AccountTrade incurs at most 10-kB storage overhead per file, and it is capable of 8-1000 concurrent data upload requests per server. Taeho Jung, Xiang-Yang Li 0001, Wenchao Huang 0001, Zhongying Qiao, Jianwei Qian, Junze Han, Jiahui Hou |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 4 |