Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ayman Chaouki

dblp:260/6345 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Branches: Efficiently Seeking Optimal Sparse Decision Trees via AO · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › sparse decision trees
optimal sparse decision trees
0.912025
Branches: Efficiently Seeking Optimal Sparse Decision Trees via AO · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
sparse decision trees
0.912025
Branches: Efficiently Seeking Optimal Sparse Decision Trees via AO · ICML 2025
Algorithms and data structures › search algorithms
AND/OR graph search
0.912025
Branches: Efficiently Seeking Optimal Sparse Decision Trees via AO · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

dynamic programming · 1.7branch-and-bound · 1.7best-first search · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Branches: Efficiently Seeking Optimal Sparse Decision Trees via AO
abstract
Decision Tree (DT) Learning is a fundamental problem in Interpretable Machine Learning, yet it poses a formidable optimisation challenge. Practical algorithms have recently emerged, primarily leveraging Dynamic Programming and Branch & Bound. However, most of these approaches rely on a Depth-First-Search strategy, which is inefficient when searching for DTs at high depths and requires the definition of a maximum depth hyperparameter. Best-First-Search was also employed by other methods to circumvent these issues. The downside of this strategy is its higher memory consumption, as such, it has to be designed in a fully efficient manner that takes full advantage of the problem’s structure. We formulate the problem as an AND/OR graph search which we solve with a novel AO*-type algorithm called Branches. We prove both optimality and complexity guarantees for Branches and we show that it is more efficient than the state of the art theoretically and on a variety of experiments. Furthermore, Branches supports non-binary features unlike the other methods, we show that this property can further induce larger gains in computational efficiency.
Ayman Chaouki, Jesse Read, Albert Bifet
ICML1
2024 Online Learning of Decision Trees with Thompson Sampling
abstract
Decision Trees are prominent prediction models for interpretable Machine Learning. They have been thoroughly researched, mostly in the batch setting with a fixed labelled dataset, leading to popular algorithms such as C4.5, ID3 and CART. Unfortunately, these methods are of heuristic nature, they rely on greedy splits offering no guarantees of global optimality and often leading to unnecessarily complex and hard-to-interpret Decision Trees. Recent breakthroughs addressed this suboptimality issue in the batch setting, but no such work has considered the online setting with data arriving in a stream. To this end, we devise a new Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithm, Thompson Sampling Decision Trees (TSDT), able to produce optimal Decision Trees in an online setting. We analyse our algorithm and prove its almost sure convergence to the optimal tree. Furthermore, we conduct extensive experiments to validate our findings empirically. The proposed TSDT outperforms existing algorithms on several benchmarks, all while presenting the practical advantage of being tailored to the online setting.
Ayman Chaouki, Jesse Read, Albert Bifet
AISTATS1