EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jingjie Lin
dblp:260/6708
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-5535-1631ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 68% Information extraction and text analysis · 27% Multi-agent systems · 4% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | More Than Just A Conversation: A Multi-agent Reasoning Graph Knowledge Distillation for Conversational Stance Detection · SIGIR 2025 Targeted Distillation for Sentiment Analysis · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
LLM distillation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | More Than Just A Conversation: A Multi-agent Reasoning Graph Knowledge Distillation for Conversational Stance Detection · SIGIR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Targeted Distillation for Sentiment Analysis · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
model distillation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Targeted Distillation for Sentiment Analysis · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Targeted Distillation for Sentiment Analysis · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
stance detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | More Than Just A Conversation: A Multi-agent Reasoning Graph Knowledge Distillation for Conversational Stance Detection · SIGIR 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-agent reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | More Than Just A Conversation: A Multi-agent Reasoning Graph Knowledge Distillation for Conversational Stance Detection · SIGIR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
knowledge distillation · 1.7sentiment analysis · 0.9multi-agent reasoning · 0.9large language model · 0.9contrastive loss · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | PiKGL: Leveraging Pruned Knowledge Graphs for Explainable Stance DetectionabstractAbstract Stance detection on social media plays a vital role in understanding public opinion on contentious topics. While prior work leverages external knowledge sources like Wikipedia to enrich limited target information, it primarily introduces conceptual content, neglecting the interpretability potential of knowledge and often leading to the incorporation of irrelevant or redundant information that hinders stance prediction performance. To address this, we introduce PiKGL, a Pruned interpretable Knowledge Graph Learning framework for explainable stance detection. Specifically, we first extract event triplets and topics to obtain real-world knowledge, which is then used to construct an interpretable knowledge graph. To ensure precision and minimize noise, we introduce a retrieval-guided pruning strategy that incorporates commonsense knowledge, filtering redundant information of the interpretable knowledge graph. Finally, the pruned knowledge graph is injected into a large language model to jointly model textual, target, and commonsense for improved stance comprehension. Experimental results conducted on three public datasets demonstrate our PiKGL achieves state-of-the-art performance on stance detection. Jingjie Lin, Zhixin Bai, Xintong Song, Qianlong Wang 0001, Min Yang 0007, Jing Li 0049, Ruifeng Xu 0001 |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 2 |
| 2025 | Targeted Distillation for Sentiment AnalysisabstractThis paper explores targeted distillation methods for sentiment analysis 1 , aiming to build compact and practical models that preserve strong and generalizable sentiment analysis capabilities.To this end, we conceptually decouple the distillation target into knowledge and alignment and accordingly propose a two-stage distillation framework.Moreover, we introduce SENTIBENCH, a comprehensive and systematic sentiment analysis benchmark that covers a diverse set of tasks across 12 datasets.We evaluate a wide range of models on this benchmark.Experimental results show that our approach substantially enhances the performance of compact models across diverse sentiment analysis tasks, and the resulting models demonstrate strong generalization to unseen tasks, showcasing robust competitiveness against existing small-scale models.2 1. collect a large and diverse set of user texts. construct large-scale distillation corpus.4. optimize student model using two-stage approach.Distillation Yice Zhang, Guangyu Xie, Jingjie Lin, Jianzhu Bao, Qianlong Wang 0001, Ruifeng Xu 0001 |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2025 | More Than Just A Conversation: A Multi-agent Reasoning Graph Knowledge Distillation for Conversational Stance DetectionabstractConversational stance detection, which aims to identify stances within conversation threads, has become a research hotspot recently. As the number of dialogue turns increases and the conversation content becomes more complex, existing methods that simply incorporate conversational context are insufficient to effectively capture the nuanced information necessary for accurate stance detection. To address this issue, we introduce a Multi-agent Reasoning Graph Knowledge Distillation (MRGKD) framework, leveraging conversational reasoning among multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) into smaller language models. Specifically, we first construct a multi-agent reasoning graph to infer implicit logical relationships within the conversational history from the diverse perspectives of multiple LLMs. To fully leverage the in-context learning capabilities of LLMs, we design a reasoning knowledge editing mechanism that internalizes new information by aligning the output distribution of smaller language models with both the conversational history and the knowledge derived from the multi-agent reasoning graph. Additionally, we incorporate a contrastive loss to distinguish between correct and incorrect reasoning, alongside a stance detection loss, to fine-tune the smaller language models. This approach not only ensures the accurate acquisition of logical knowledge but also preserves the integrity of the conversational history. Experiments conducted on two public datasets demonstrate that our MRGKD significantly outperforms all baselines. Zhixin Bai, Qianlong Wang 0001, Jingjie Lin, Min Yang 0007, Ruifeng Xu 0001 |
SIGIR | 4 |
| 2024 | Removing Stray-Light for Wild-Field Fundus Image Fusion Based on Large Generative Models
Jun Wu 0022, Mingxin He, Jingjie Lin, Dayong Ding |
MMM (4) | 4 |