Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Jingjie Lin

dblp:260/6708 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-5535-1631ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 68% Information extraction and text analysis · 27% Multi-agent systems · 4%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
1.722025
More Than Just A Conversation: A Multi-agent Reasoning Graph Knowledge Distillation for Conversational Stance Detection · SIGIR 2025
Targeted Distillation for Sentiment Analysis · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
LLM distillation
0.912025
More Than Just A Conversation: A Multi-agent Reasoning Graph Knowledge Distillation for Conversational Stance Detection · SIGIR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.912025
Targeted Distillation for Sentiment Analysis · EMNLP 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
model distillation
0.912025
Targeted Distillation for Sentiment Analysis · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.912025
Targeted Distillation for Sentiment Analysis · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
stance detection
0.912025
More Than Just A Conversation: A Multi-agent Reasoning Graph Knowledge Distillation for Conversational Stance Detection · SIGIR 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-agent reasoning
0.312025
More Than Just A Conversation: A Multi-agent Reasoning Graph Knowledge Distillation for Conversational Stance Detection · SIGIR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

knowledge distillation · 1.7sentiment analysis · 0.9multi-agent reasoning · 0.9large language model · 0.9contrastive loss · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 PiKGL: Leveraging Pruned Knowledge Graphs for Explainable Stance Detection
abstract
Abstract Stance detection on social media plays a vital role in understanding public opinion on contentious topics. While prior work leverages external knowledge sources like Wikipedia to enrich limited target information, it primarily introduces conceptual content, neglecting the interpretability potential of knowledge and often leading to the incorporation of irrelevant or redundant information that hinders stance prediction performance. To address this, we introduce PiKGL, a Pruned interpretable Knowledge Graph Learning framework for explainable stance detection. Specifically, we first extract event triplets and topics to obtain real-world knowledge, which is then used to construct an interpretable knowledge graph. To ensure precision and minimize noise, we introduce a retrieval-guided pruning strategy that incorporates commonsense knowledge, filtering redundant information of the interpretable knowledge graph. Finally, the pruned knowledge graph is injected into a large language model to jointly model textual, target, and commonsense for improved stance comprehension. Experimental results conducted on three public datasets demonstrate our PiKGL achieves state-of-the-art performance on stance detection.
Jingjie Lin, Zhixin Bai, Xintong Song, Qianlong Wang 0001, Min Yang 0007, Jing Li 0049, Ruifeng Xu 0001
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics2
2025 Targeted Distillation for Sentiment Analysis
abstract
This paper explores targeted distillation methods for sentiment analysis 1 , aiming to build compact and practical models that preserve strong and generalizable sentiment analysis capabilities.To this end, we conceptually decouple the distillation target into knowledge and alignment and accordingly propose a two-stage distillation framework.Moreover, we introduce SENTIBENCH, a comprehensive and systematic sentiment analysis benchmark that covers a diverse set of tasks across 12 datasets.We evaluate a wide range of models on this benchmark.Experimental results show that our approach substantially enhances the performance of compact models across diverse sentiment analysis tasks, and the resulting models demonstrate strong generalization to unseen tasks, showcasing robust competitiveness against existing small-scale models.2 1. collect a large and diverse set of user texts. construct large-scale distillation corpus.4. optimize student model using two-stage approach.Distillation
Yice Zhang, Guangyu Xie, Jingjie Lin, Jianzhu Bao, Qianlong Wang 0001, Ruifeng Xu 0001
EMNLP3
2025 More Than Just A Conversation: A Multi-agent Reasoning Graph Knowledge Distillation for Conversational Stance Detection
abstract
Conversational stance detection, which aims to identify stances within conversation threads, has become a research hotspot recently. As the number of dialogue turns increases and the conversation content becomes more complex, existing methods that simply incorporate conversational context are insufficient to effectively capture the nuanced information necessary for accurate stance detection. To address this issue, we introduce a Multi-agent Reasoning Graph Knowledge Distillation (MRGKD) framework, leveraging conversational reasoning among multiple Large Language Models (LLMs) into smaller language models. Specifically, we first construct a multi-agent reasoning graph to infer implicit logical relationships within the conversational history from the diverse perspectives of multiple LLMs. To fully leverage the in-context learning capabilities of LLMs, we design a reasoning knowledge editing mechanism that internalizes new information by aligning the output distribution of smaller language models with both the conversational history and the knowledge derived from the multi-agent reasoning graph. Additionally, we incorporate a contrastive loss to distinguish between correct and incorrect reasoning, alongside a stance detection loss, to fine-tune the smaller language models. This approach not only ensures the accurate acquisition of logical knowledge but also preserves the integrity of the conversational history. Experiments conducted on two public datasets demonstrate that our MRGKD significantly outperforms all baselines.
Zhixin Bai, Qianlong Wang 0001, Jingjie Lin, Min Yang 0007, Ruifeng Xu 0001
SIGIR4
2024 Removing Stray-Light for Wild-Field Fundus Image Fusion Based on Large Generative Models
Jun Wu 0022, Mingxin He, Jingjie Lin, Dayong Ding
MMM (4)4