Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Avrajit Ghosh

dblp:261/2812 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
6as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8336-3426ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Optimization for machine learning · 29% Deep learning architectures and training · 20% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
edge of stability
1.722025
Variational Learning Finds Flatter Solutions at the Edge of Stability · NeurIPS 2025
Learning Dynamics of Deep Matrix Factorization Beyond the Edge of Stability · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
implicit regularization
1.522025
Variational Learning Finds Flatter Solutions at the Edge of Stability · NeurIPS 2025
Implicit regularization in Heavy-ball momentum accelerated stochastic gradient descent · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
learning dynamics
0.912025
Learning Dynamics of Deep Matrix Factorization Beyond the Edge of Stability · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.912025
Variational Learning Finds Flatter Solutions at the Edge of Stability · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
variational learning
0.912025
Variational Learning Finds Flatter Solutions at the Edge of Stability · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.812024
Optimal Eye Surgeon: Finding image priors through sparse generators at initialization · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
0.812024
Optimal Eye Surgeon: Finding image priors through sparse generators at initialization · ICML 2024
Image and video processing › image statistics › statistical image modeling
image prior
0.812024
Optimal Eye Surgeon: Finding image priors through sparse generators at initialization · ICML 2024
Image and video processing
image restoration
0.812024
Optimal Eye Surgeon: Finding image priors through sparse generators at initialization · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.712023
Implicit regularization in Heavy-ball momentum accelerated stochastic gradient descent · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient descent
0.312025
Learning Dynamics of Deep Matrix Factorization Beyond the Edge of Stability · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
PAC-Bayes bounds
0.312025
Variational Learning Finds Flatter Solutions at the Edge of Stability · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lottery ticket hypothesis · 1.5deep image prior · 1.5variational posterior · 0.9gradient flow analysis · 0.9edge of stability analysis · 0.9deep matrix factorization · 0.9heavy-ball momentum · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Learning Dynamics of Deep Matrix Factorization Beyond the Edge of Stability
abstract
Deep neural networks trained using gradient descent with a fixed learning rate $\eta$ often operate in the regime of ``edge of stability'' (EOS), where the largest eigenvalue of the Hessian equilibrates about the stability threshold $2/\eta$. In this work, we present a fine-grained analysis of the learning dynamics of (deep) linear networks (DLNs) within the deep matrix factorization loss beyond EOS. For DLNs, loss oscillations beyond EOS follow a period-doubling route to chaos. We theoretically analyze the regime of the 2-period orbit and show that the loss oscillations occur within a small subspace, with the dimension of the subspace precisely characterized by the learning rate. The crux of our analysis lies in showing that the symmetry-induced conservation law for gradient flow, defined as the balancing gap among the singular values across layers, breaks at EOS and decays monotonically to zero. Overall, our results contribute to explaining two key phenomena in deep networks: (i) shallow models and simple tasks do not always exhibit EOS; and (ii) oscillations occur within top features}. We present experiments to support our theory, along with examples demonstrating how these phenomena occur in nonlinear networks and how they differ from those which have benign landscape such as in DLNs.
Avrajit Ghosh, Soo Min Kwon, Saiprasad Ravishankar, Qing Qu 0001
ICLR1
2025 Variational Learning Finds Flatter Solutions at the Edge of Stability
abstract
Variational Learning (VL) has recently gained popularity for training deep neural networks. Part of its empirical success can be explained by theories such as PAC-Bayes bounds, minimum description length and marginal likelihood, but little has been done to unravel the implicit regularization in play. Here, we analyze the implicit regularization of VL through the Edge of Stability (EoS) framework. EoS has previously been used to show that gradient descent can find flat solutions and we extend this result to show that VL can find even flatter solutions. This result is obtained by controlling the shape of the variational posterior as well as the number of posterior samples used during training. The derivation follows in a similar fashion as in the standard EoS literature for deep learning, by first deriving a result for a quadratic problem and then extending it to deep neural networks. We empirically validate these findings on a wide variety of large networks, such as ResNet and ViT, to find that the theoretical results closely match the empirical ones. Ours is the first work to analyze the EoS dynamics of~VL.
Avrajit Ghosh, Bai Cong, Rio Yokota, Saiprasad Ravishankar, Molei Tao, Mohammad Emtiyaz Khan, Thomas Möllenhoff
NeurIPS1
2024 Optimal Eye Surgeon: Finding image priors through sparse generators at initialization
abstract
We introduce Optimal Eye Surgeon (OES), a framework for pruning and training deep image generator networks. Typically, untrained deep convolutional networks, which include image sampling operations, serve as effective image priors. However, they tend to overfit to noise in image restoration tasks due to being overparameterized. OES addresses this by adaptively pruning networks at random initialization to a level of underparameterization. This process effectively captures low-frequency image components even without training, by just masking. When trained to fit noisy image, these pruned subnetworks, which we term Sparse-DIP, resist overfitting to noise. This benefit arises from underparameterization and the regularization effect of masking, constraining them in the manifold of image priors. We demonstrate that subnetworks pruned through OES surpass other leading pruning methods, such as the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis, which is known to be suboptimal for image recovery tasks. Our extensive experiments demonstrate the transferability of OES-masks and the characteristics of sparse-subnetworks for image generation. Code is available at https://github.com/Avra98/Optimal-Eye-Surgeon.
Avrajit Ghosh, Xitong Zhang, Kenneth K. Sun, Qing Qu 0001, Saiprasad Ravishankar
ICML1
2024 Learning Sparsity-Promoting Regularizers Using Bilevel Optimization
abstract
Abstract. We present a gradient-based heuristic method for supervised learning of sparsity-promoting regularizers for denoising signals and images. Sparsity-promoting regularization is a key ingredient in solving modern signal reconstruction problems; however, the operators underlying these regularizers are usually either designed by hand or learned from data in an unsupervised way. The recent success of supervised learning (e.g., with convolutional neural networks) in solving image reconstruction problems suggests that it could be a fruitful approach to designing regularizers. Towards this end, we propose to denoise signals using a variational formulation with a parametric, sparsity-promoting regularizer, where the parameters of the regularizer are learned to minimize the mean squared error of reconstructions on a training set of ground truth image and measurement pairs. Training involves solving a challenging bilevel optimization problem; we derive an expression for the gradient of the training loss using the closed-form solution of the denoising problem and provide an accompanying gradient descent algorithm to minimize it. Our experiments with structured 1D signals and natural images indicate that the proposed method can learn an operator that outperforms well-known regularizers (total variation, DCT-sparsity, and unsupervised dictionary learning) and collaborative filtering for denoising.
Avrajit Ghosh, Michael T. McCann, Madeline Mitchell, Saiprasad Ravishankar
SIAM J. Imaging Sci.1
2023 Implicit regularization in Heavy-ball momentum accelerated stochastic gradient descent
Avrajit Ghosh, He Lyu, Xitong Zhang
ICLR1
2022 Bilevel Learning of ℓ1 Regularizers with Closed-Form Gradients (BLORC)
abstract
We present a method for supervised learning of sparsity-promoting regularizers, which are a key ingredient in many modern signal reconstruction approaches. The parameters of the regularizer are learned to minimize the mean squared error of reconstruction on a training set of ground truth signal and measurement pairs. Training involves solving a challenging bilevel optimization problem with a nonsmooth lower-level objective. We derive an expression for the gradient of the training loss using the implicit closed-form solution of the lower-level variational problem given by its dual problem, and provide an accompanying gradient descent algorithm (dubbed BLORC) to minimize the loss. Our experiments on simple natural images and for denoising 1D signals show that the proposed method can learn meaningful operators and the analytical gradients are calculated faster than standard automatic differentiation methods. While the approach we present is applied to denoising, we believe that it could be adapted to a wide variety of inverse problems with linear measurement models, thus giving it applicability in a wide range of scenarios.
Avrajit Ghosh, Michael T. McCann, Saiprasad Ravishankar
ICASSP1