EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kaiyue Zhao
dblp:261/2989
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Logic in computer science · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › temporal reasoning
DatalogMTL |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Incremental Maintenance of DatalogMTL Materialisations · AAAI 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › automated reasoning
incremental reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Incremental Maintenance of DatalogMTL Materialisations · AAAI 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic-based reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Incremental Maintenance of DatalogMTL Materialisations · AAAI 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic in computer science › logical foundations › non-classical logics › temporal logic
temporal logic reasoning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Incremental Maintenance of DatalogMTL Materialisations · AAAI 2026 |
Logic in computer science › logic programming
magic sets |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Goal-Driven Reasoning in DatalogMTL with Magic Sets · AAAI 2025 |
Logic in computer science › logic for databases
query rewriting |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Goal-Driven Reasoning in DatalogMTL with Magic Sets · AAAI 2025 |
Logic in computer science
temporal reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Goal-Driven Reasoning in DatalogMTL with Magic Sets · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
periodic interval representation · 1.0delete/rederive algorithm · 1.0top-down evaluation simulation · 0.9magic sets rewriting · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Incremental Maintenance of DatalogMTL MaterialisationsabstractDatalogMTL extends the classical Datalog language with metric temporal logic (MTL), enabling expressive reasoning over temporal data. While existing reasoning approaches, such as materialisation-based and automata-based methods, offer soundness and completeness, they lack support for handling efficient dynamic updates—a crucial requirement for real-world applications that involve frequent data updates. In this work, we propose DRedMTL, an incremental reasoning algorithm for DatalogMTL with bounded intervals. Our algorithm builds upon the classical Delete/Rederive (DRed) algorithm, which incrementally updates the materialisation of a Datalog program. Unlike a Datalog materialisation which is in essence a finite set of facts, a DatalogMTL materialisation has to be represented as a finite set of facts plus periodic intervals indicating how the full materialisation can be constructed through unfolding. To cope with this, our algorithm is equipped with specifically designed operators to efficiently handle such periodic representations of DatalogMTL materialisations. We have implemented this approach and tested it on several publicly available datasets. Experimental results show that DRedMTL often significantly outperforms rematerialisation, sometimes by orders of magnitude. Kaiyue Zhao, Dingqi Chen, Pan Hu 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | Goal-Driven Reasoning in DatalogMTL with Magic SetsabstractDatalogMTL is a powerful rule-based language for temporal reasoning. Due to its high expressive power and flexible modeling capabilities, it is suitable for a wide range of applications, including tasks from industrial and financial sectors. However, due its high computational complexity, practical reasoning in DatalogMTL is highly challenging. To address this difficulty, we introduce a new reasoning method for DatalogMTL which exploits the magic sets technique—a rewriting approach developed for (non-temporal) Datalog to simulate top-down evaluation with bottom-up reasoning. We have implemented this approach and evaluated it on publicly available benchmarks, showing that the proposed approach significantly and consistently outperformed state-of-the-art reasoning techniques. Kaiyue Zhao, Dongliang Wei, Przemyslaw Andrzej Walega, Dingmin Wang, Hongming Cai 0001, Pan Hu 0001 |
AAAI | 2 |