Peter C. W. Lee

dblp:261/3932 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-2320-6365ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
cancer classification
0.412020
Cancer classification of single-cell gene expression data by neural network · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
machine learning for genomics
0.412020
Cancer classification of single-cell gene expression data by neural network · Bioinform. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

support vector machine · 0.4random forest · 0.4neural network · 0.4kNN smoothing · 0.4k-nearest neighbor · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Cancer classification of single-cell gene expression data by neural network
abstract
MOTIVATION: Cancer classification based on gene expression profiles has provided insight on the causes of cancer and cancer treatment. Recently, machine learning-based approaches have been attempted in downstream cancer analysis to address the large differences in gene expression values, as determined by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). RESULTS: We designed cancer classifiers that can identify 21 types of cancers and normal tissues based on bulk RNA-seq as well as scRNA-seq data. Training was performed with 7398 cancer samples and 640 normal samples from 21 tumors and normal tissues in TCGA based on the 300 most significant genes expressed in each cancer. Then, we compared neural network (NN), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (kNN) and random forest (RF) methods. The NN performed consistently better than other methods. We further applied our approach to scRNA-seq transformed by kNN smoothing and found that our model successfully classified cancer types and normal samples. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Cancer classification by neural network. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Bong-Hyun Kim, Kijin Yu, Peter C. W. Lee
Bioinform.3