EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter C. W. Lee
dblp:261/3932
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-2320-6365ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
cancer classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Cancer classification of single-cell gene expression data by neural network · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
machine learning for genomics |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Cancer classification of single-cell gene expression data by neural network · Bioinform. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
support vector machine · 0.4random forest · 0.4neural network · 0.4kNN smoothing · 0.4k-nearest neighbor · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Cancer classification of single-cell gene expression data by neural networkabstractMOTIVATION: Cancer classification based on gene expression profiles has provided insight on the causes of cancer and cancer treatment. Recently, machine learning-based approaches have been attempted in downstream cancer analysis to address the large differences in gene expression values, as determined by single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). RESULTS: We designed cancer classifiers that can identify 21 types of cancers and normal tissues based on bulk RNA-seq as well as scRNA-seq data. Training was performed with 7398 cancer samples and 640 normal samples from 21 tumors and normal tissues in TCGA based on the 300 most significant genes expressed in each cancer. Then, we compared neural network (NN), support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (kNN) and random forest (RF) methods. The NN performed consistently better than other methods. We further applied our approach to scRNA-seq transformed by kNN smoothing and found that our model successfully classified cancer types and normal samples. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Cancer classification by neural network. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Bong-Hyun Kim, Kijin Yu, Peter C. W. Lee |
Bioinform. | 3 |