Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Oliver Rawashdeh

dblp:261/4365 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-7147-4778ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
chronobiology
0.412020
CircaCompare: a method to estimate and statistically support differences in mesor, amplitude and phase, between circadian rhythms · Bioinform. 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology
circadian rhythm analysis
0.412020
CircaCompare: a method to estimate and statistically support differences in mesor, amplitude and phase, between circadian rhythms · Bioinform. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical hypothesis testing · 0.4cosinusoidal modeling · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 CircaCompare: a method to estimate and statistically support differences in mesor, amplitude and phase, between circadian rhythms
abstract
MOTIVATION: A fundamental interest in chronobiology is to compare patterns between groups of rhythmic data. However, many existing methods are ill-equipped to derive statements concerning the statistical significance of differences between rhythms that may be visually apparent. This is attributed to both the form of data used (longitudinal versus cross-sectional) and the limitations of the statistical tests used to draw conclusions. RESULTS: To address this problem, we propose that a cosinusoidal curve with a particular parametrization be used to model and compare data of two sets of observations collected over a 24-h period. The novelty of our test is in the parametrization, which allows the explicit estimation of rhythmic parameters [mesor (the rhythm-adjusted mean level of a response variable around which a wave function oscillates), amplitude and phase], and simultaneously testing for statistical significance in all three parameters between two or more groups of datasets. A statistically significant difference between two groups, regarding each of these rhythmic parameters, is indicated by a P-value. The method is evaluated by applying the model to publicly available datasets, and is further exemplified by comparison to the currently recommended method, DODR. The results suggest that the method proposed may be highly sensitive to detect rhythmic differences between groups in phase, amplitude and mesor. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/RWParsons/circacompare/.
Rex Parsons, Richard Parsons, Nicholas Garner, Henrik Oster, Oliver Rawashdeh
Bioinform.5