Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Santosh Santosh
dblp:261/7526
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 70% Face, body and person analysis · 30% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face forgery detection
AI-generated face detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AI-Face: A Million-Scale Demographically Annotated AI-Generated Face Dataset and Fairness Benchmark · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
deepfake detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AI-Face: A Million-Scale Demographically Annotated AI-Generated Face Dataset and Fairness Benchmark · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › group fairness
demographic fairness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AI-Face: A Million-Scale Demographically Annotated AI-Generated Face Dataset and Fairness Benchmark · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AI-Face: A Million-Scale Demographically Annotated AI-Generated Face Dataset and Fairness Benchmark · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face recognition |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | AI-Face: A Million-Scale Demographically Annotated AI-Generated Face Dataset and Fairness Benchmark · CVPR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fairness benchmark · 0.9demographic annotation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | AI-Face: A Million-Scale Demographically Annotated AI-Generated Face Dataset and Fairness BenchmarkabstractAI-generated faces have enriched human life, such as entertainment, education, and art. However, they also pose misuse risks. Therefore, detecting AI-generated faces becomes crucial, yet current detectors show biased performance across different demographic groups. Mitigating biases can be done by designing algorithmic fairness methods, which usually require demographically annotated face datasets for model training. However, no existing dataset encompasses both demographic attributes and diverse generative methods simultaneously, which hinders the development of fair detectors for AI-generated faces. In this work, we introduce the AI-Face dataset, the first million-scale demographically annotated AI-generated face image dataset, including real faces, faces from deepfake videos, and faces generated by Generative Adversarial Networks and Diffusion Models. Based on this dataset, we conduct the first comprehensive fairness benchmark to assess various AI face detectors and provide valuable insights and findings to promote the future fair design of AI face detectors. Our AI-Face dataset and benchmark code are publicly available at https://github.com/Purdue-M2/AI-Face-FairnessBench. Santosh Santosh |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2020 | PowerNet: Transferable Dynamic IR Drop Estimation via Maximum Convolutional Neural NetworkabstractIR drop is a fundamental constraint required by almost all chip designs. However, its evaluation usually takes a long time that hinders mitigation techniques for fixing its violations. In this work, we develop a fast dynamic IR drop estimation technique, named PowerNet, based on a convolutional neural network (CNN). It can handle both vector-based and vectorless IR analyses. Moreover, the proposed CNN model is general and transferable to different designs. This is in contrast to most existing machine learning (ML) approaches, where a model is applicable only to a specific design. Experimental results show that PowerNet outperforms the latest ML method by 9% in accuracy for the challenging case of vectorless IR drop and achieves a 30× speedup compared to an accurate IR drop commercial tool. Further, a mitigation tool guided by PowerNet reduces IR drop hotspots by 26% and 31% on two industrial designs, respectively, with very limited modification on their power grids. Zhiyao Xie, Haoxing Ren, Brucek Khailany, Ye Sheng, Santosh Santosh, Jiang Hu 0001, Yiran Chen 0001 |
ASP-DAC | 5 |