Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hussain Hussain

dblp:261/9046 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
algorithmic fairness
0.612022
Adversarial Inter-Group Link Injection Degrades the Fairness of Graph Neural Networks · ICDM 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › graph neural network robustness
graph neural network adversarial attack
0.612022
Adversarial Inter-Group Link Injection Degrades the Fairness of Graph Neural Networks · ICDM 2022
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack
0.612022
Adversarial Inter-Group Link Injection Degrades the Fairness of Graph Neural Networks · ICDM 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

link injection attack · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Adversarial Inter-Group Link Injection Degrades the Fairness of Graph Neural Networks
abstract
We present evidence for the existence and effectiveness of adversarial attacks on graph neural networks (GNNs) that aim to degrade fairness. These attacks can disadvantage a particular subgroup of nodes in GNN-based node classification, where nodes of the underlying network have sensitive attributes, such as race or gender. We conduct qualitative and experimental analyses explaining how adversarial link injection impairs the fairness of GNN predictions. For example, an attacker can compromise the fairness of GNN-based node classification by injecting adversarial links between nodes belonging to opposite subgroups and opposite class labels. Our experiments on empirical datasets demonstrate that adversarial fairness attacks can significantly degrade the fairness of GNN predictions (attacks are effective) with a low perturbation rate (attacks are efficient) and without a significant drop in accuracy (attacks are deceptive). This work demonstrates the vulnerability of GNN models to adversarial fairness attacks. We hope our findings raise awareness about this issue in our community and lay a foundation for the future development of GNN models that are more robust to such attacks.
Hussain Hussain, Sandipan Sikdar, Denis Helic, Elisabeth Lex, Markus Strohmaier, Roman Kern
ICDM1
2020 Empirical Comparison of Graph Embeddings for Trust-Based Collaborative Filtering
Tomislav Duricic, Hussain Hussain, Emanuel Lacic, Dominik Kowald, Denis Helic, Elisabeth Lex
ISMIS2