Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sarah M. Pratt
dblp:261/9102
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Language models and text generation · 51% Efficient and distributed learning · 16% Deep learning architectures and training · 8% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding
autoregressive decoding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Superposed Decoding: Multiple Generations from a Single Autoregressive Inference Pass · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
decoding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Superposed Decoding: Multiple Generations from a Single Autoregressive Inference Pass · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
language model pretraining |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Superposed Decoding: Multiple Generations from a Single Autoregressive Inference Pass · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data curation
training data curation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting
prompt engineering |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | What does a platypus look like? Generating customized prompts for zero-shot image classification · ICCV 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting › prompt engineering
prompt generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | What does a platypus look like? Generating customized prompts for zero-shot image classification · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › zero-shot learning
zero-shot classification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | What does a platypus look like? Generating customized prompts for zero-shot image classification · ICCV 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual grounding
grounded situation recognition |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Grounded Situation Recognition · ECCV (4) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
data mixing |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
open-vocabulary classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | What does a platypus look like? Generating customized prompts for zero-shot image classification · ICCV 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language pretraining |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasets · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic role labeling |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Grounded Situation Recognition · ECCV (4) 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
nucleus sampling · 0.8n-gram interpolation · 0.8model-based filtering · 0.8greedy decoding · 0.8deduplication · 0.8open-vocabulary model · 0.7large language model · 0.7data filtering · 0.7customized prompts · 0.7CLIP training · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language modelsabstractWe introduce DataComp for Language Models, a testbed for controlled dataset experiments with the goal of improving language models.As part of DCLM, we provide a standardized corpus of 240T tokens extracted from Common Crawl, effective pretraining recipes based on the OpenLM framework, and a broad suite of 53 downstream evaluations.Participants in the DCLM benchmark can experiment with data curation strategies such as deduplication, filtering, and data mixing atmodel scales ranging from 412M to 7B parameters.As a baseline for DCLM, we conduct extensive experiments and find that model-based filtering is key to assembling a high-quality training set.The resulting dataset, DCLM-Baseline, enables training a 7B parameter language model from scratch to 63% 5-shot accuracy on MMLU with 2T training tokens.Compared to MAP-Neo, the previous state-of-the-art in open-data language models, DCLM-Baseline represents a 6 percentage point improvement on MMLU while being trained with half the compute.Our results highlight the importance of dataset design for training language models and offer a starting point for further research on data curation. We release the \dclm benchmark, framework, models, and datasets at https://www.datacomp.ai/dclm/ Jeffrey Li, Alex Fang, Georgios Smyrnis, Maor Ivgi, Matt Jordan, Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Hritik Bansal, Etash Kumar Guha, Sedrick Keh, Kushal Arora, Niklas Muennighoff, Reinhard Heckel, Jean Mercat, Mayee F. Chen, Suchin Gururangan, Mitchell Wortsman, Alon Albalak, Yonatan Bitton, Marianna Nezhurina, Amro Abbas, Cheng-Yu Hsieh, Dhruba Ghosh, Josh Gardner 0001, Maciej Kilian, Hanlin Zhang 0002, Rulin Shao, Sarah M. Pratt, Sunny Sanyal, Gabriel Ilharco, Giannis Daras, Kalyani Marathe, Aaron Gokaslan, Jieyu Zhang 0001, Khyathi Raghavi Chandu, Igor Vasiljevic, Sham M. Kakade, Shuran Song, Sujay Sanghavi, Fartash Faghri, Sewoong Oh, Luke Zettlemoyer, Kyle Lo, Alaaeldin El-Nouby, Hadi Pouransari, Alexander Toshev, Stephanie Wang, Dirk Groeneveld, Luca Soldaini, Pang Wei Koh, Jenia Jitsev, Thomas Kollar, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Yair Carmon, Achal Dave, Ludwig Schmidt, Vaishaal Shankar |
NeurIPS | 29 |
| 2024 | Superposed Decoding: Multiple Generations from a Single Autoregressive Inference PassabstractMany applications today provide users with multiple auto-complete drafts as they type, including GitHub's code completion, Gmail's smart compose, and Apple's messaging auto-suggestions. Under the hood, language models support this by running an autoregressive inference pass to provide a draft. Consequently, providing $k$ drafts to the user requires running an expensive language model $k$ times. To alleviate the computation cost of running $k$ inference passes, we propose Superposed Decoding, a new decoding algorithm that generates $k$ drafts at the computation cost of one autoregressive inference pass. We achieve this by feeding a superposition of the most recent token embeddings from the $k$ drafts as input to the next decoding step of the language model. At every inference step we combine the $k$ drafts with the top-$k$ tokens to get $k^2$ new drafts and cache the $k$ most likely options, using an n-gram interpolation with minimal compute overhead to filter out incoherent generations. Our experiments show that $k$ drafts from Superposed Decoding are at least as coherent and factual as Nucleus Sampling and Greedy Decoding respectively, while being at least $2.44\times$ faster for $k\ge3$. In a compute-normalized setting, user evaluations demonstrably favor text generated by Superposed Decoding over Nucleus Sampling. Superposed Decoding can also be combined with other decoding strategies, resulting in universal coverage gains when scaling inference time compute. Code and more examples open-sourced at https://github.com/RAIVNLab/SuperposedDecoding. Ethan Shen, Alan Fan, Sarah M. Pratt, Matthew Wallingford, Sham M. Kakade, Ari Holtzman, Ranjay Krishna, Ali Farhadi, Aditya Kusupati |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | What does a platypus look like? Generating customized prompts for zero-shot image classificationabstractOpen-vocabulary models are a promising new paradigm for image classification. Unlike traditional classification models, open-vocabulary models classify among any arbitrary set of categories specified with natural language during inference. This natural language, called "prompts", typically consists of a set of hand-written templates (e.g., "a photo of a {}") which are completed with each of the category names. This work introduces a simple method to generate higher accuracy prompts, without relying on any explicit knowledge of the task domain and with far fewer hand-constructed sentences. To achieve this, we combine open-vocabulary models with large language models (LLMs) to create Customized Prompts via Language models (CuPL, pronounced "couple"). In particular, we leverage the knowledge contained in LLMs in order to generate many descriptive sentences that contain important discriminating characteristics of the image categories. This allows the model to place a greater importance on these regions in the image when making predictions. We find that this straightforward and general approach improves accuracy on a range of zero-shot image classification benchmarks, including over one percentage point gain on ImageNet. Finally, this simple baseline requires no additional training and remains completely zero-shot. Code available at https://github.com/sarahpratt/CuPL. Sarah M. Pratt, Ian Covert, Rosanne Liu, Ali Farhadi |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2023 | DataComp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasetsabstractMultimodal datasets are a critical component in recent breakthroughs such as CLIP, Stable Diffusion and GPT-4, yet their design does not receive the same research attention as model architectures or training algorithms. To address this shortcoming in the machine learning ecosystem, we introduce DataComp, a testbed for dataset experiments centered around a new candidate pool of 12.8 billion image-text pairs from Common Crawl. Participants in our benchmark design new filtering techniques or curate new data sources and then evaluate their new dataset by running our standardized CLIP training code and testing the resulting model on 38 downstream test sets. Our benchmark consists of multiple compute scales spanning four orders of magnitude, which enables the study of scaling trends and makes the benchmark accessible to researchers with varying resources. Our baseline experiments show that the DataComp workflow leads to better training sets. Our best baseline, DataComp-1B, enables training a CLIP ViT-L/14 from scratch to 79.2% zero-shot accuracy on ImageNet, outperforming OpenAI's CLIP ViT-L/14 by 3.7 percentage points while using the same training procedure and compute. We release \datanet and all accompanying code at www.datacomp.ai. Samir Yitzhak Gadre, Gabriel Ilharco, Alex Fang, Jonathan Hayase, Georgios Smyrnis, Ryan Marten, Mitchell Wortsman, Dhruba Ghosh, Jieyu Zhang 0001, Eyal Orgad, Rahim Entezari, Giannis Daras, Sarah M. Pratt, Vivek Ramanujan, Yonatan Bitton, Kalyani Marathe, Stephen Mussmann, Richard Vencu, Mehdi Cherti, Ranjay Krishna, Pang Wei Koh, Olga Saukh, Alexander Ratner, Shuran Song, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Ali Farhadi, Romain Beaumont, Sewoong Oh, Alexandros G. Dimakis, Jenia Jitsev, Yair Carmon, Vaishaal Shankar, Ludwig Schmidt |
NeurIPS | 14 |
| 2021 | Learning Generalizable Visual Representations via Interactive Gameplay
Luca Weihs, Aniruddha Kembhavi, Kiana Ehsani, Sarah M. Pratt, Winson Han, Alvaro Herrasti, Eric Kolve, Dustin Schwenk, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Ali Farhadi |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2020 | Grounded Situation Recognition
Sarah M. Pratt, Mark Yatskar, Luca Weihs, Ali Farhadi, Aniruddha Kembhavi |
ECCV (4) | 1 |